advertisement

WGA Rescources

Abstract #10103 Published in IGR 6-1

Persistency with latanoprost or timolol in primary open-angle glaucoma suspects

Schwartz GF; Reardon G; Mozaffari E
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2004; 137: S13-16


PURPOSE: To evaluate persistency of pharmacotherapy in primary open-angle glaucoma suspects (glaucoma suspects) treated with latanoprost and timolol. DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study using the Protocare Sciences managed care database; approximately three million members in commercial health maintenance organizations and preferred provider organizations and in Medicare risk plans. METHODS: Patients aged 20 years or older beginning therapy between January 1st, 1997, and June 30th, 2002, with latanoprost or timolol monotherapy were included. Patients must have been continuously enrolled and not undergone glaucoma surgery in the year preceding the index prescription fill and had glaucoma suspect diagnoses before and after the index date. Prescription refill records for all ocular hypotensives were extracted through June 30th, 2002. The two outcome measures were discontinuation of index drug, and either discontinuation or change in index drug. Changing therapy was defined as switching to or adding another ocular hypotensive. Rates of discontinuation and discontinuation/change were compared using Cox regression models. RESULTS: In all, 1474 patients met the inclusion criteria. Latanoprost was prescribed for 583 patients (40%) and timolol for 891 (60%). Compared with latanoprost, those treated with timolol were 39% more likely to discontinue and 27% more likely to discontinue/change therapy (p < 0.001 for both comparisons). At 12 months, 39% of patients receiving latanoprost and 25% of those treated with timolol had not discontinued therapy; no discontinuation or change in therapy was seen in 30 and 18%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Latanoprost-treated glaucoma suspects demonstrated significantly greater persistency than patients treated with timolol. The reasons for this difference and its impact on intraocular pressure control and disease progression require further research.

Dr. G.F. Schwartz, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. schwartzgf@aol.com


Classification:

11.1 General management, indication (Part of: 11 Medical treatment)



Issue 6-1

Change Issue


advertisement

Oculus