advertisement
PURPOSE: To evaluate rates and risk factors associated with follow-up adherence to in-person glaucoma evaluations and confirmed glaucoma diagnosis in glaucoma suspects identified through teleretinal diabetic retinopathy screening (TDRS). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study SUBJECTS: Patients with diabetes identified through teleretinal screening to have large or asymmetric cup-to-disc ratios in a Los Angeles County safety-net primary care-based TDRS program. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed to obtain demographic and clinical information for patients with cup-to-disc ratios concerning for glaucoma on TDRS. Patients who completed an in-person follow-up appointment within 1 year of teleretinal screening were adherent. Factors associated with follow-up adherence and diagnosis of glaucoma were analyzed with chi-square and independent t tests along with multivariable logistic regressions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of patients with suspected glaucoma who adhered with in-person follow-up examination, proportion of patients with confirmed glaucoma diagnosis, and factors associated with follow-up adherence and glaucoma diagnosis. RESULTS: Eight-hundred seventeen patients with optic discs suspicious for glaucoma were included. Five-hundred thirty-four (65.4%) patients successfully completed an in-person glaucoma evaluation. Among these patients, 62.9% and 24.5% received a diagnosis of glaucoma suspect and glaucomatous optic neuropathy, respectively. Compared with patients aged < 50 years, patients aged 50 to 64 years had 1.57 times higher odds of being adherent with in-person visits (P = 0.036), whereas no difference was seen in those aged ≥ 65 years. For every $10 000 increase in the zip code median income, patients had 11% lower odds of being adherent (P = 0.031). Compared with Latino patients, Black patients had 3.52 times (P < 0.001) higher odds of having confirmed glaucoma. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients referred as glaucoma suspects on TDRS completed a follow-up examination, and nearly a quarter of those examined received a confirmed glaucoma diagnosis. Patients aged ≥ 50 and < 65 years along with those from lower-income neighborhoods were more likely to follow up for an in-person evaluation. Compared with Latino patients, Black patients had a higher risk for a confirmed glaucoma diagnosis. This demonstrates the effectiveness of glaucoma detection in a large-scale TDRS program for a safety-net patient population. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Department of Ophthalmology, USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Full article