advertisement
Abstract #107512 Published in IGR 23-4
Central retina plays a decisive role in the suppression of pupillary escape
Kelbsch C; Jendritza R; Strasser T; Tonagel F; Richter P; Jung R; Peters T; Wilhelm H; Wilhelm B; Stingl KGraefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2023; 261: 1713-1722
PURPOSE: To explore the pupil redilation during persistent light exposure (pupillary escape phenomenon) at the macula and periphery with monochromatic light stimuli. METHODS: Forty healthy subjects aged 18-64 years (24 females) were examined by chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC) using red and blue 4-s stimuli of 10° radius at the center and 20°-peripheral locations one per quadrant. One glaucoma patient and one achromatopsia patient served as disease models. For statistical analyses, linear mixed-effects models were performed followed by post hoc t-tests. RESULTS: A distinct pupillary escape could be demonstrated peripherally (blue 0.099%*s, red 0.153%*s); at the central healthy retina, there was no relevant escape, neither for blue nor red stimulation. Comparing central versus peripheral stimulation revealed highly significant differences in the escape (difference blue 0.100 ± 0.013, red 0.144 ± 0.013, < 0.0001, respectively). In the periphery, the escape was significantly more pronounced for red compared with blue stimulation (difference 0.054 ± 0.013; p = 0.0001). Enhanced pupillary escape outside of the 95% confidence interval of the linear mixed-effects model of the healthy population could be exemplarily shown in a patient with glaucomatous ganglion cell damage. In the achromatopsia example, no relevant escape was found for blue stimulation, but for red stimulation in the periphery in a comparable range to healthy controls. CONCLUSION: The results emphasize that an intact inner retinal network of nerve fibers arising from the central macular region is necessary for maintaining pupillary constriction during a bright 4-s light stimulus and preventing increase of pupillary escape. Increasing receptive field sizes towards the periphery on the level of retinal ganglion cells and less input from central 1:1 connections could be one of the driving mechanisms for pupillary escape.
Full article
