advertisement
Abstract #112161 Published in IGR 24-3
Standard anterior peritomy versus a small posterior incision for the implantation of the PRESERFLO microshunt
Bamousa A; Dakroub M; Dakroub M; Verma-Fuehring R; Verma-Fuehring R; Papadopoulos K; Hillenkamp J; Loewen NAInternational Ophthalmology 2023; 43: 5071-5078
PURPOSE: To compare two approaches for the implantation of the PRESERFLO microshunt: an anterior approach (A) with a 6-8-mm peritomy and a posterior approach (P) with a 3-mm incision. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 126 patients who received a PRESERFLO microshunt. We compared intraocular pressure (IOP), surgical time, medication count, and postoperative complications over nine months. RESULTS: The baseline IOP was similar in A (21.8 ± 8.5 mm Hg) and P (23.9 ± 8.1 mm Hg) (p = 0.08). Surgical duration was significantly shorter in P (10 ± 0.4 min) than in A (26 ± 0.8 min) (p < 0.001). Postoperative IOP levels were comparable in A (10.8 ± 5.9 mm Hg) and P (10.6 ± 4.5 mm Hg) at 30 days (p = 0.62) and throughout the study (all intra-group p-values > 0.08). The preoperative medication count was 3.2 ± 1.3 drops in A and 3.3 ± 1.0 drops in P (p = 0.4). Postoperative values were 0.2 ± 0.6 in A and 0.3 ± 0.7 in P at nine months. There were no significant differences in complications and surgical revisions between groups (p-values > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both techniques achieved satisfactory IOP and medication count reductions and had similar safety profiles, but the posterior incision technique was 2.6 times faster than the anterior incision technique.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Full article