advertisement
AIMS: To compare the diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) efficacy and safety of timolol vs latanoprost in subjects with exfoliation glaucoma (XFG). METHODS: A 3-month prospective, single-masked, active-controlled, parallel comparison performed in six centres in Greece that randomized subjects in a 1 : 1 ratio to either latanoprost in the evening (2000 hours) and placebo in the morning (0800 hours), or timolol twice daily (0800 and 2000 hours). RESULTS: In all, 103 subjects completed the study. After 3 months of chronic dosing, the latanoprost group exhibited a trend to a greater diurnal IOP reduction from an untreated baseline (24.9 ± 3.2-17.4 ± 2.9) compared with timolol (24.7 ± 2.8-18.3 ± 1.9 mmHg) (P = 0.07). Latanoprost showed a significantly greater IOP reduction at 0800 hours (-8.5 vs -6.0 mmHg for timolol, P < 0.0001) whereas no difference was observed between the two medications at 1000, 1400, and 2000 hours after a Bonferroni Correction. In addition, latanoprost demonstrated a narrower range of diurnal IOP (2.4) than timolol (3.2 mmHg)(P = 0.0017). Safety was similar between groups, except there was more conjunctival hyperaemia with latanoprost (n = 8) than timolol (n = 1)(P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that latanoprost provides a statistically lower 08:00-hour IOP and better range of IOP than timolol in the treatment of XFG glaucoma.
Dr. W.C. Stewart MD, Pharmaceutical Research Network, LLC 1639 Tatum Street Charleston, SC 29412, USA. prnc@bellsouth.net
11.3.4 Betablocker (Part of: 11 Medical treatment > 11.3 Adrenergic drugs)
9.4.4.1 Exfoliation syndrome (Part of: 9 Clinical forms of glaucomas > 9.4 Glaucomas associated with other ocular and systemic disorders > 9.4.4 Glaucomas associated with disorders of the lens)
11.4 Prostaglandins (Part of: 11 Medical treatment)