advertisement
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 24-hour efficacy of brimonidine purite versus dorzolamide, each added to latanoprost. DESIGN: Double-masked, 2-center, prospective, crossover comparison. PARTICIPANTS: Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to brimonidine purite or dorzolamide, each given twice daily, for the first 6-week treatment period after a 6-week latanoprost run-in. Subjects began the opposite treatment for the second 6-week period after a 6-week latanoprost-only treatment between periods. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured at 8 am, 12 pm, 4 pm, 8 pm, 12 am, 4 am, and 8 am at each baseline and at the end of each treatment period. This study provided an 80% power that a 1.5-mmHg difference could be excluded between groups if 27 subjects completed the study. A standard deviation (SD) of 2.8 mmHg was assumed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Twenty-four-hour efficacy of intraocular pressures of brimonidine purite versus dorzolamide, each added to latanoprost. RESULTS: In 31 completed subjects, the baseline mean diurnal 24-hour IOP (± SD) was 19.0 ± 1.7 mmHg for brimonidine purite and 19.0 ± 1.6 mmHg for dorzolamide (P = 0.52). The 8 am IOP after 6 weeks of therapy was 18.4 ± 2.1 mmHg for brimonidine purite and 18.9 ± 1.9 mmHg for dorzolamide (P = 0.40). The mean diurnal IOP was 16.9 ± 1.5 mmHg for brimonidine purite and 16.8 ± 1.5 mmHg for dorzolamide (P = 0.66). Dorzolamide caused a more bitter taste (P = 0.01) than brimonidine purite. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that brimonidine purite and dorzolamide, added to latanoprost, have similar efficacy and safety in POAG or ocular hypertensive subjects.
Dr. A.G. Konstas, University Department of Ophthalmology, AHEPA Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
11.4 Prostaglandins (Part of: 11 Medical treatment)
11.5.2 Topical (Part of: 11 Medical treatment > 11.5 Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors)