advertisement
Abstract #15831 Published in IGR 2-3
Foldable silicone versus poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses in combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy(2)(2)
Braga-Mele R; Cohen S; Rootman DSJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2000; 26: 1517-1522
To compare the outcome of phacotrabeculectomy with implantation of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) or foldable silicone intraocular lenses (IOLs).Thirty patients were randomized to receive a 5.5-mm PMMA IOL through a 5.0-mm incision or a foldable silicone IOL (Allergan SI-30) through a 3.2-mm incision. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), bleb survival, inflammation, endothelial cell changes, and complications were examined at intervals of up to six months. There was no difference between the two groups in final visual outcome, final IOP control, bleb survival, and endothelial cell changes. Two months after surgery, there was significantly more inflammation in the silicone IOL group than in the PMMA group (p < 0.05). The silicone group had a significantly higher combined complication rate including iris capture, choroidal effusion, and epiretinal membrane formation (p < 0.05). Foldable silicone IOLs were comparable to conventional PMMA lenses in visual outcome, IOP control, bleb formation, and endothelial changes. However, some silicone lenses are associated with an increased risk of recurrence of inflammation and a higher final complication rate in combined cataract and filtration surgery.
Dr. R. Braga-Mele, University of Toronto, Toronto Hospital (Western Division), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Classification:
12.14.3 Phacoemulsification (Part of: 12 Surgical treatment > 12.14 Combined cataract extraction and glaucoma surgery)
