advertisement
Abstract #16837 Published in IGR 9-1
Latanoprost versus timolol gel-forming solution once daily in primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension
Harasymowycz P; Hutnik CM; Nicolela M; Stewart WCCanadian Journal of Ophthalmology 2007; 42: 75-81
BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy and safety of latanoprost and timolol gel-forming solution (GFS). METHODS: This was a randomized, crossover, investigator-masked, active-control study of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Patients received either once-daily 0.5% timolol GFS (n = 40) or once-daily 0.005% latanoprost (n = 35) for 8 weeks (period 1). Patients were then crossed over to the other medication and treated for another 8 weeks (period 2). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was determined every 2 hours from 8:00 to 20:00 at baseline and weeks 8 and 16. Safety was assessed by visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and adverse event reports. RESULTS: During period 1, reduction in mean (SD) diurnal IOP was significantly greater in latanoprost-treated patients (-6.9 [3.0] mmHg) than in timolol GFS-treated patients (-5.5 [2.4] mmHg), p = 0.034. There was also a significant reduction in IOP from baseline after switching from timolol GFS to latanoprost (p < 0.001), not observed when patients were switched from latanoprost to timolol GFS. After results from each drug's treatment periods were combined between treatment arms, latanoprost reduced IOP more (-6.9 [2.9] mmHg) than did timolol GFS (-6.2 [2.7] mmHg), p = 0.018. Hyperemia was the most common adverse event in both treatment groups, with 5 incidences in timolol GFS-treated patients, and 10 in latanoprost. Interpretation: Latanoprost is more effective than timolol GFS in reducing IOP, and patients switched from timolol GFS to latanoprost have a further significant reduction in IOP.
Classification:
11.4 Prostaglandins (Part of: 11 Medical treatment)
11.3.4 Betablocker (Part of: 11 Medical treatment > 11.3 Adrenergic drugs)
