advertisement
Abstract #19979 Published in IGR 9-4
A comparison of the polypropylene plate Ahmed glaucoma valve to the silicone plate Ahmed glaucoma flexible valve
Hinkle DM; Zurakowski D; Ayyala RSEuropean Journal of Ophthalmology 2007; 17: 696-701
See also comment(s) by Robert Feldman & Omar Piovanetti •
PURPOSE: To compare surgical outcomes following implantation of the polypropylene plate Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) (S-2) and the newer silicone plate AGV (FP-7) with minimum 12 months follow-up in patients with intractable glaucoma. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of 25 eyes of 22 patients who underwent FP-7 and 26 eyes of 22 patients who underwent S-2 AGV implantation by a single surgeon. Main outcome measures included surgical outcomes in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) control, hypertensive phase, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in diagnoses, pre- and postoperative IOP, pre- and postoperative visual acuities at all time points, and in the number of pre- and postoperative medications between the groups. Significant IOP reductions occurred after FP-7 implantation (29.6 ± 13.1 to 12.1 ± 3.4, p < 0.001) and S-2 implantation (31.4 ± 11.7 to 16.1 ± 5.7, p < 0.001). The FP-7 group had a statistically lower IOP compared to the S-2 group at six (p < 0.05), 9 (p < 0.01), and 12 months (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the hypertensive phase between the two groups (p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: FP-7 model silicone plate AGV resulted in lower IOP compared to the older S-2 polypropylene plate AGV at one year. This may suggest that the plate material may influence clinical outcome.
Dr. D.M. Hinkle, Department of Ophthalmology, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112-2699, USA
Classification:
12.8.2 With tube implant or other drainage devices (Part of: 12 Surgical treatment > 12.8 Filtering surgery)
