advertisement
PURPOSE: The efficacy of two non-invasive tonometers, TonoLab and TonoPen XL, in detecting physiological or pharmacological changes of intraocular pressure (IOP) in mouse eyes, was assessed by comparison with a microneedle method. MATERIAL AND METHODS: C57BL6 mice, bred under the 12-hr light and dark cycle over 2 weeks, were used. Under systemic anesthesia, mouse eyes were cannulated by a microneedle connected to a transducer and a water reservoir. We manipulated the intracameral pressure by changing the reservoir height, and obtained tonometer readings at each pressure (n = 39) with TonoLab and TonoPen XL. The correlation between each tonometer and the manometer was analyzed. Then the diurnal variation of IOP in the light and dark phases, and the IOP-lowering effect at 2 hrs after latanoprost instillation, were measured with TonoLab, TonoPen XL, and a microneedle tonometer (n = 8). RESULTS: In mouse eyes, TonoPen XL could not show reliable scores, but TonoLab readings showed a strong correlation with manometer readings (y = 0.87x-0.27, r2 = 0.917). Nocturnal elevation of IOP in mouse eyes was significantly indicated with TonoLab and a microneedle tonometer (p < 0.001), but not with TonoPen XL. Latanoprost significantly reduced IOP by 2.1 ± 2.8 and 2.0 ± 1.0 mmHg with TonoLab and a microneedle tonometer, but not with TonoPen XL. CONCLUSION: TonoLab provides similar readings to a microneedle tonometer, and diurnal variation and drug effect were detectable in mouse eyes. TonoLab promises to be a non-invasive and useful method to evaluate physiological and pharmacological studies in mouse eyes.
Dr. T. Saeki, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
6.1.1 Devices, techniques (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods > 6.1 Intraocular pressure measurement; factors affecting IOP)
5.1 Rodent (Part of: 5 Experimental glaucoma; animal models)