advertisement

Topcon

Abstract #27930 Published in IGR 13-1

Laminar and prelaminar tissue displacement during intraocular pressure elevation in glaucoma patients and healthy controls

Agoumi Y; Sharpe GP; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; Artes PH; Chauhan BC
Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 52-59

See also comment(s) by Crawford Downs


Objective: To determine the response of the anterior lamina cribrosa and prelaminar tissue to acute elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects. Design: Prospective case-control series. Participants and Controls: Patients with open-angle glaucoma (n = 12; mean age(plus or minus)standard deviation [SD], 66.8(plus or minus)6.0 years), age-matched healthy controls (n = 12; mean age(plus or minus)SD, 67.1(plus or minus)6.2 years), and young controls (n = 12; mean age(plus or minus)SD, 36.1(plus or minus)11.7 years). Methods: One eye was imaged with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography to obtain 12 high-resolution radial scans centered on the optic disc. Imaging was repeated at precisely the same locations with an ophthalmodynamometer held perpendicular to the globe via the inferior lid to raise the IOP. A line joining Bruch's membrane opening in 4 radial scans was used as reference in the baseline and elevated IOP images. The vertical distance from the reference line to the anterior prelaminar tissue surface and anterior laminar surface was measured at equidistant points along the reference line in the 2 sets of images. The difference between the 2 sets of corresponding measurements were used to determine laminar displacement (LD) and prelaminar tissue displacement (PTD). Main Outcome Measures: Laminar displacement and PTD. Results: Intraocular pressure elevation among patients, age-matched controls, and young controls was similar (mean(plus or minus)SD, 12.4(plus or minus)3.2 mmHg). The mean(plus or minus)SD LD and PTD were 0.5(plus or minus)3.3 (mu)m and 15.7(plus or minus)15.5 (mu)m, respectively. The LD was not statistically different from 0 (P = 0.366), but PTD was (P<0.001). The mean(plus or minus)SD LD was similar among the groups (-0.5(plus or minus)3.7 (mu)m, 0.2(plus or minus)2.0 (mu)m, and 2.0(plus or minus)3.6 (mu)m, respectively; P = 0.366), whereas the mean(plus or minus)SD PTD was different (6.8(plus or minus)13.7 (mu)m, 20.8(plus or minus)17.5 (mu)m, and 19.6(plus or minus)11.8 (mu)m, respectively; P = 0.045). In all subjects, the PTD was greater than LD. In multivariate regression analyses, LD was negatively associated with optic disc size (P = 0.007), whereas PTD was positively associated with the degree of IOP elevation (P = 0.013). Conclusions: In glaucoma patients and controls, the anterior laminar surface is noncompliant to acute IOP elevation. Acute optic disc surface changes represent compression of prelaminar tissue and not laminar displacement.

B. C. Chauhan. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie University, 1276 South Park Street, 2W Victoria, Halifax, NS B3H 2Y9, Canada. bal@dal.ca


Classification:

6.13 Provocative tests (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods)
2.3 Sclera (Part of: 2 Anatomical structures in glaucoma)
2.14 Optic disc (Part of: 2 Anatomical structures in glaucoma)



Issue 13-1

Change Issue


advertisement

Oculus