advertisement

Topcon

Abstract #46202 Published in IGR 13-2

Agreement between the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) stereometric parameters estimated using HRT-I and HRT-II

Balasubramanian M; Bowd C; Weinreb RN; Zangwill LM
Optometry and Vision Science 2011; 88: 140-149


To assess agreement between Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT)-I and HRT-II stereometric parameters and to determine whether parabolic error correction (PEC) to the topographies improves agreement. University of California San Diego Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study participants with two HRT-II examinations (n = 380) or one HRT-I and one HRT-II examinations (n = 344) acquired on the same day were included. From the group of 380 eyes, 200 eyes were randomly selected to estimate the repeatability coefficients of HRT-II rim area and volume, cup area and volume, and mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness parameters (HRT-II control group), and the remaining 180 eyes were used to assess agreement between two HRT-II examinations (HRT-II study group). Agreement between stereometric parameters of HRT-I and HRT-II examinations (HRT-I vs. HRT-II study group) were assessed with (1) no PEC, (2) HRT PEC, and (3) a modified PEC. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement using estimates of bias and clinical limits of agreement (CLA) based on repeatability coefficients. In the HRT-II study group, agreement between stereometric parameters was good, with no statistically significant biases. For all parameters, differences were within the CLA in 94% of participants. In the HRT-I vs. HRT-II study group, there was a small statistically significant bias between the stereometric parameters, but all differences were within CLA for (greater-than or equal to)95% of participants. In both study groups, PEC did not improve agreement. Agreement between HRT-I and HRT-II stereometric parameters was good, and PEC did not improve agreement. These results suggest that HRT-I and HRT-II examinations can be used interchangeably to detect changes in stereometric parameters over time.

M. Balasubramanian. Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.


Classification:

6.9.1.1 Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods > 6.9 Computerized image analysis > 6.9.1 Laser scanning)



Issue 13-2

Change Issue


advertisement

Oculus