advertisement
Abstract #48791 Published in IGR 14-1
Timogel® vs timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution: efficacy, safety, and acceptance
Rolle T; Curto D; Alovisi C; Franzone M; Brogliatti B; Grignolo FMEuropean Journal of Ophthalmology 0; 22: 28-33
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Timogel® preservative-free once daily compared to timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution bid in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) and patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: A total of 75 patients with OHT and patients with POAG treated with timolol 0.5% bid with intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤ 21 mmHg were enrolled. They underwent complete ophthalmologic examination, IOP measurements (at trough and daytime curve), evaluation of side effects, Schirmer test, break-up time [BUT], blood pressure, heart rate, ocular diastolic perfusion pressure measurements, and acceptance (Comparison of Ophthalmic Medications for Tolerability). Patients switched to Timogel® and were re-evaluated 3 months later. The analysis of variance and the Pearson Chi2 tests were used to test differences between the treatments. RESULTS: Intraocular pressure reduction at trough was 23.6% with timolol 0.5% and 22.3% with Timogel®. No statistical differences were observed in IOP values at trough and in the daytime curve between the 2 treatments. Local and systemic side effects were less frequent with Timogel® (hazard ratio: p<0.05). Patients demonstrated a significant improvement of Schirmer test and BUT (p<0.05) and a reduction of dryness and foreign body sensation (42.6% vs 15.4%; p<0.01) after switching to Timogel®. Mild and short-lasting blurred vision after Timogel® instillation occurred in about 18.5% of patients. A total of 82% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with Timogel® vs 61% with previous treatment (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Timogel® preservative-free dosed once every morning has a 24-hour hypotensive effect with a better safety profile than timolol 0.5% bid and it is well-accepted by patients. The once-daily dosing improved acceptance and compliance.
Department of Clinical Physiopathology, Section of Ophthalmology, Eye Clinic, University of Torino, Torino, Italy. teresa.rolle@unito.it
Full articleClassification:
11.16 Vehicles, delivery systems, pharmacokinetics, formulation (Part of: 11 Medical treatment)
11.3.4 Betablocker (Part of: 11 Medical treatment > 11.3 Adrenergic drugs)
