advertisement
Abstract #50821 Published in IGR 14-3
Measurement of optic disc size and rim area with spectral-domain OCT and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy
Moghimi S; Hosseini H; Riddle J; Lee GY; Bitrian E; Giaconi J; Caprioli J; Nouri-Mahdavi KInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2012; 53: 4519-4530
PURPOSE: To compare optic disc and neuroretinal rim area measurements from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) to those from confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. METHODS: Seventy-one eyes from 43 normal subjects or suspected/definite glaucoma patients were prospectively enrolled. All subjects had biometry with the IOLMaster and disc/retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with Cirrus SD-OCT (Optic Disc Cube 200×200) and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT). Uncorrected disc and rim areas and measurements corrected for eye magnification with Bennett's formula (AL-corrected measurements), along with 30° sectoral rim areas, vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR), and cup volume, were compared between the two devices. RESULTS: The median (range) axial length (AL) was 24.2 mm (22.4-27.7 mm). Mean keratometry-corrected HRT disc area measurements were larger than AL-corrected HRT and SD-OCT measurements (P < 0.001 for both) and the difference was a function of keratometry measurements (K-readings). The AL-corrected HRT disc area and uncorrected/corrected Cirrus disc areas were not significantly different (P > 0.481). HRT rim area was larger than Cirrus measurements (P < 0.001) and the difference decreased with decreasing rim area. HRT VCDR and cup volume were significantly smaller than Cirrus measurements (P < 0.001). The correlations for sectoral rim areas between the two devices were moderate at best (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.12-0.65). CONCLUSIONS: HRT overestimated optic disc area as compared to SD-OCT. A portion of the difference in HRT and SD-OCT disc measurements is due to HRT's magnification correction algorithm. Rim area measurements from HRT were larger than from SD-OCT, likely a result of different definitions for the reference plane and differences in disc area measurements. Disc parameters from the two devices are not interchangeable.
Glaucoma Division, Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Full articleClassification:
6.9.1.1 Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods > 6.9 Computerized image analysis > 6.9.1 Laser scanning)
6.9.2.2 Posterior (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods > 6.9 Computerized image analysis > 6.9.2 Optical coherence tomography)
2.14 Optic disc (Part of: 2 Anatomical structures in glaucoma)