advertisement
Abstract #66648 Published in IGR 17-4
Can higher end tonometers be used interchangeably in routine clinical practice?
Patel KJ; Jain SP; Kapadia PR; Patel NV; Patel S; Patel VIndian Journal of Ophthalmology 2016; 64: 132-135
CONTEXT: Precise intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is important in glaucoma practise. Various instruments are available today to accurately measure IOP. Thus, the question arises about which instrument to use and whether all of them can be used interchangeably. AIMS: To assess the agreement between noncontact tonometer (NCT), rebound tonometer (RBT), Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) in measuring IOP. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 499 eyes of 250 patients were evaluated during a period of 24 months from September 2010 to August 2012 and measurement of IOP by NCT, RBT, GAT, and DCT was done in the given sequence. The agreement was assessed by use of the Bland-Altman plot keeping GAT as a gold standard technique. RESULTS: The mean IOP value of NCT, RBT, GAT, and DCT was 15.9 ± 5.5, 15.9 ± 5.8, 15.9 ± 4.9, and 16.0 ± 4.7 mm of Hg, respectively. The limits of agreement of GAT with DCT, NCT, and RBT were found to be +5.4 to -5.2, -4.7 to +4.6, and -5.2 to +5.1 mm of Hg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A positive and strong correlation was found between newer tonometers and GAT, but the limit of agreement was clinically unacceptable. The use of a single tonometer should be practised at a glaucoma clinic for a patient at each follow-up.
Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College, Surat, Gujarat, India.
Full articleClassification:
6.1.1 Devices, techniques (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods > 6.1 Intraocular pressure measurement; factors affecting IOP)
