advertisement
Abstract #6731 Published in IGR 4-1
Sensitivity differences between real-patient and computer-stimulated visual fields
Vesti E; Spry PGD; Chauhan BC; Johnson CAJournal of Glaucoma 2002; 11: 35-45
PURPOSE: The authors sought to verify computer simulation of visual fields by comparing thresholds of real and corresponding simulated visual fields. METHODS: Four patients with stable glaucomatous visual fields and three with progressing glaucomatous visual fields were chosen for the study. Visual fields had been recorded at six-month intervals for five to 7.5 years. A previously described computer simulation program was used to generate a corresponding simulated visual field for each of the real fields. Twenty different levels of response variability and long-term variability were used in the simulations. Pointwise sensitivity differences between real and simulated fields were calculated. The average difference and 95% interval of the differences were analyzed for the different simulation conditions, for the pointwise sensitivities in the real patient fields, and to determine whether the field was stable or progressing. RESULTS: In almost all simulation conditions, the average pointwise sensitivity differences ranged from -1 to 1 dB and were not significantly different among different simulation conditions. The 95% interval of the average difference increased significantly with response variability, whereas long-term variability failed to show any apparent effect. Average pointwise differences and the 95% intervals were greatest in locations where the real-patient field had reduced sensitivity of 14 dB or worse. CONCLUSION: The simulation program provided good estimates of visual field sensitivities. Increasing amounts of response, but not long-term variability, produced a linear increase in the variability of threshold sensitivities. This finding implies that short-term rather than long-term fluctuation is the most important factor determining the variability of thresholds.
Dr. E. Vesti, Department of Ophthalmology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Classification:
6.6.2 Automated (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods > 6.6 Visual field examination and other visual function tests)
