advertisement
Abstract #79087 Published in IGR 20-1
A Method to Measure the Rate of Glaucomatous Visual Field Change
Caprioli J; Mohamed L; Morales E; Rabiolo A; Sears N; Pradtana H; Alizadeh R; Yu F; Afifi AA; Coleman AL; Nouri-Mahdavi KTranslational vision science & technology 2018; 7: 14
PURPOSE: To develop a method to measure the rate of glaucomatous visual field (VF) deterioration and to identify fast progressors. METHODS: Retrospective, longitudinal, observational study of 8486 eyes of 4610 glaucomatous patients with ≥6 VFs and ≥3 years of follow-up. A Glaucoma Rate Index (GRI) was calculated. VF locations were partitioned into exponential decay or exponential improvement models. A pointwise rate of change (PRC) was estimated with an exponential fit and expressed as the percent/year change of the age- and location-matched normal perimetric range, presented as a spatially conserved VF map. PRCs were summed and normalized with boundary rates set by simulated decaying and improving VF series on a scale of -100 to +100, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 89,704 VF examinations with 425,039 test location series was used. Median follow-up and number of VFs/eye were 9.7 years and 9 VFs, respectively. Initial and final mean deviations (±SD) were -4.2 (±5.2) and -5.7 (±6.4) dB. The proportions of test locations designated as decayed, improved, and unchanged were 13%, 4%, and 83%, respectively. Mean PRCs for decay, improvement, and no change were -3.7 (±4.7)%/y, 2.5 (±2.6)%/y, and -0.5 (±2.1)%/y, respectively. The number of eyes with negative and positive GRIs was 5802 (68%) and 2390 eyes (28%), respectively. The proportion of eyes defined as fast progressors was 6.8%. CONCLUSIONS: GRI provides a robust measure of glaucomatous VF change, operates without discontinuity over the entire perimetric range, and can be used to identify fast progressors. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: This study describes a novel method that can help the clinician to determine VF progression.
Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Full articleClassification:
6.20 Progression (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods)
6.6.2 Automated (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods > 6.6 Visual field examination and other visual function tests)
