advertisement
Abstract #82148 Published in IGR 20-4
Safety and Effectiveness of CyPass Supraciliary Micro-Stent in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: 5-Year Results from the COMPASS XT Study
Reiss G; Clifford B; Vold S; He J; Hamilton C; Hamilton C; Dickerson J; Lane SAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology 2019; 208: 219-225
PURPOSE: To characterize the long-term (up to 5 years) safety and effectiveness of the supraciliary Micro-Stent (Alcon) implanted at the time of phacoemulsification in eyes with coexisting open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and visually significant cataract. DESIGN: Three-year safety extension of a 2-year randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Patients from the multicenter Study of an Implantable Device for Lowering Intraocular Pressure in Glaucoma Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery (COMPASS) trial who underwent Micro-Stent implantation plus phacoemulsification (n = 215) or phacoemulsification alone (n = 67) were evaluated 36, 48, and 60 months postoperatively. The primary outcome measurement was the occurrence of sight-threatening ocular adverse events. Evaluations at each time point included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anterior and posterior segment examinations, tonometry, gonioscopy, pachymetry, perimetry, specular microscopy, and assessment of adverse events. RESULTS: Three sight-threatening ocular adverse events occurred, 2 in the Micro-Stent group and 1 in the control group, but none of these events was related to the Micro-Stent device. Ocular adverse events were of similar frequencies in both groups, the most common of which were BCVA loss of ≥2 lines compared with best BCVA in COMPASS and worsening of visual field mean defect (VFMD) ≥2.5 dB compared with month 24. Changes in mean BCVA from baseline, clinical examinations, pachymetry, and VFMD were similar in the 2 groups. At 60 months, a higher proportion of subjects in the Micro-Stent group (46%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 38.9%-53.2%) than in the control group (32.1%; 95% CI 19.9%-46.3%) were able to achieve a reduction of ≥20% in intraocular pressure without using hypotensive medication. CONCLUSIONS: Few sight-threatening serious ocular adverse events occurred following Micro-Stent implantation, and clinical evidence of corneal decompensation was minimal.
Eye Physicians and Surgeons of Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Full articleClassification:
12.8.2 With tube implant or other drainage devices (Part of: 12 Surgical treatment > 12.8 Filtering surgery)
