advertisement
Abstract #86308 Published in IGR 21-2
Visual Field Plots: A Comparison Study Between Standard Automated Perimetry and Eye Movement Perimetry
Mazumdar D; Pel JJM; Kadavath Meethal NS; Asokan R; Panday M; Steen JVD; George RJournal of Glaucoma 2020; 29: 351-361
: PRéCIS: This eye movement perimetry (EMP) study describes the development of saccadic reaction time (SRT)-based visual field plots, which could effectively display the presence, location, and extent of glaucomatous defects and support clinical decision-making. PURPOSE: EMP is capable of discriminating normal from glaucomatous visual field defects on the basis of average delays in SRTs. To classify the presence and extent of age-corrected visual field defects, it is required to create SRT-based probability maps. AIM: The aim of this study was to create visual field probability plots based on SRTs and to evaluate their clinical applicability by 2 glaucoma specialists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The development phase included 95 controls segregated into 5 age-bins to estimate normative limits of SRT. Next, for the testing phase, a set of 28 healthy subjects and 24 glaucoma patients were recruited who underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP) and EMP visual field testing. Fifty-two SAP and EMP plots were presented to 2 glaucoma specialists to classify them as normal or abnormal and to identify the defect location and pattern as 1 or more of 7 predefined categories. RESULTS: The glaucoma specialists showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 93% and 96% for identifying normal versus abnormal visual field. For specialists 1 and 2, 85% and 92%, respectively, of EMP reports were assigned to the same category as SAP. The reports that did not agree with SAP were graded to a higher defect pattern. The intermethod agreement for specialists 1 and 2 was κ 0.92 and 0.96, respectively. CONCLUSION: SRT-based visual field probability plots provided a comprehensive summary of an individual's visual field status and showed comparable clinical applicability to that of SAP plots.
Full article
Classification:
6.6.2 Automated (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods > 6.6 Visual field examination and other visual function tests)
6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.) (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods > 6.6 Visual field examination and other visual function tests)
