advertisement
Abstract #86438 Published in IGR 21-2
A Comparison of Trabeculectomy Surgery Outcomes With Mitomycin-C Applied by Intra-Tenon Injection Versus Sponge
Lim MC; Hom B; Watnik MR; Brandt JD; Altman AR; Paul T; Tong MGAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 216: 243-256
PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of mitomycin-C (MMC) delivered by intra-Tenon injection vs sponge application during trabeculectomy surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 566 patients with primary and secondary glaucoma diagnoses who received trabeculectomy surgery with MMC in an academic medical center. Exclusion criteria were age less than 18 years, no light perception vision, combined surgery, previous glaucoma incisional surgery, intraoperative 5-fluorouracil, or follow-up <1 month. Subjects were divided into 2 cohorts: MMC delivered by sponge application or by intra-Tenon injection. Main outcome measures were postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) level and secondary measures were survival rate for IOP control, glaucoma medication use, complication rate, and vision. RESULTS: After inclusion/exclusion criteria, 316 eyes were available for analysis; 131 eyes had MMC delivered via sponge and 185 eyes via injection. Mean postoperative IOP was not significantly different between treatment groups but change in IOP from baseline was lower in the sponge vs the injection group 24 months after surgery (P = .038). The MMC sponge group had significantly more tense, vascularized, or encapsulated blebs as a late complication (P = .046). Time to failure for postoperative IOP control was not significantly different between MMC treatment groups, but older patient age and limbus-based conjunctival incision were associated with significantly longer time to fail. CONCLUSIONS: The application of MMC by injection was similar to application by sponge in lowering IOP in patients with glaucoma and the safety of both techniques appears to be comparable. Limbus-based conjunctival incision had longer time to failure for postoperative IOP control vs fornix-based incision. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.
Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA. Electronic address: mclim@ucdavis.edu.
Full articleClassification:
12.8.10 Woundhealing antifibrosis (Part of: 12 Surgical treatment > 12.8 Filtering surgery)
