advertisement
Abstract #99595 Published in IGR 23-1
Dynamic Alterations in Blood Flow in Glaucoma Measured with Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging
Vinnett A; Kandukuri J; Le C; Cho KA; Sinha A; Asanad S; Asanad S; Thompson G; Chen V; Rege A; Saeedi OJOphthalmology. Glaucoma 2022; 5: 250-261
PURPOSE: To assess the repeatability of blood flow velocity index (BFVi) metrics obtained with a recently Food and Drug Administration-cleared laser speckle contrast imaging device, the XyCAM RI (Vasoptic Medical, Inc), and to characterize differences in these metrics among control, glaucoma suspect, and glaucoma participants. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-six participants: 20 control, 16 glaucoma suspect, and 10 glaucoma participants, 1 eye per participant. METHODS: Key dynamic BFVi metrics-mean, peak, dip, volumetric rise index (VRI), volumetric fall index (VFI), time to rise (TtR), time to fall (TtF), blow-out time (BOT), skew, and acceleration time index-were measured in the optic disc, optic disc vessels, optic disc perfusion region, and macula in 4 imaging sessions on the same day. Intrasession and intersession variability were calculated using the coefficient of variation (CV) for each metric in each region of interest (ROI). Values for each dynamic BFVi variable were compared between glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, and control participants using bivariate and multivariate analysis. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to correlate each variable in each ROI with age, intraocular pressure, cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), mean deviation, pattern standard deviation, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and minimum rim width. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Coefficient of variation for the intrasession and intersession variability for each dynamic BFVi metric in each ROI and differences in each metric in each ROI between each diagnostic group. RESULTS: Intersession CV for mean, peak, dip, VRI, VFI, TtR, and TtF ranged from 3.2 ± 2.5% to 11.0 ± 3.8%. Age, CDR, OCT metrics, and visual field metrics showed significant correlations with dynamic BFVi variables. Peak, mean, dip, VRI, and VFI were significantly lower in patients with glaucoma than in control participants in all ROIs except the fovea. These metrics also were significantly lower in glaucoma patients than glaucoma suspect patients in the disc vessels. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic blood flow metrics measured with the XyCAM RI are reliable, are associated with structural and functional glaucoma metrics, and are significantly different among glaucoma, glaucoma suspect, and control participants. The XyCAM RI may serve as an important tool in glaucoma management in the future.
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland.
Full article