advertisement
Abstract #54477 Published in IGR 15-3
Tube versus trabeculectomy study
Thieme H; Choritz L; Schuart C; Wecke TOphthalmologe 2013; 110: 728-732
Epibulbar glaucoma drainage devices have been only slightly modified since their introduction more than 40 years ago. Having been used primarily in only difficult cases with a poor prognosis (and therefore with poor clinical results) the recently published trabeculectomy versus tube study (TVT) led to a change in our understanding of these devices. In this study epibulbar glaucoma drainage devices (here the Baerveldt device) were employed for early implantation (in some cases as primary glaucoma surgery intervention). Being sceptically monitored the results over the first 5 year clearly showed an almost equal or even better outcome in comparison to trabeculectomy. Despite these good results a critical evaluation seems mandatory mainly because of the unsolved problems concerning late complications. Late tube erosion with subsequent blebitis and enophthalmitis as well as late base plate encapsulation need to be mentioned here. The latter leads to thick fibrous tissue around the base plate resulting in an increase of intraocular pressure (IOP). Late corneal decompensation is also a late complication the pathomechanism of which is only poorly understood. Solving and treating such late complications are often troublesome and time consuming. Future experiments should lead to development of new drainage implant designs and the bulk material should be enhanced and optimized to increase clinical surgical results.
Universitätsmedizin, Augenklinik und Augenpoliklinik, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Deutschland. augenklinik@ovgu.de
Full articleClassification:
12.8.2 With tube implant or other drainage devices (Part of: 12 Surgical treatment > 12.8 Filtering surgery)
