advertisement
Abstract #5481 Published in IGR 1-2
Aqueous misdirection after glaucoma drainage device implantation.
Greenfield DS; Tello C; Budenz DL; Liebmann JM; Ritch ROphthalmology 1999; 106: 1035-1040
OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical presentation, outcome, and possible underlying mechanism of aqueous misdirection after glaucoma drainage device implantation. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Ten eyes (five primary open-angle glaucoma, four chronic angle-closure glaucoma, one nanophthalmos) of nine patients with a mean age of 68.5±12.0 years (range, 43-83 years). Intervention: The authors reviewed the medical records of all patients with a clinical diagnosis of aqueous misdirection after Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device implantation at two tertiary care referral centers from October 1992 to October 1997. Surgery was performed in a standardized fashion; all drainage tubes were inserted in the anterior chamber and occluded with an external 7-0 polyglactin ligature. All eyes were treated with topical corticosteroids, cycloplegia, and aqueous suppressants. Eyes with persistent aqueous misdirection received neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) hyaloidotomy or pars plana vitrectomy. Main outcome measures: Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, biomicroscopic anterior chamber depth, and antiglaucomatous medication. RESULTS: All eyes had axial shallowing of the anterior chamber, one or more patent iridotomies, and no ophthalmoscopic or B-scan ultrasonographic evidence of serous or hemorrhagic ciliochoroidal detachment. Median time to the development of angle-closure glaucoma was 33.5 days (range, 1-343 days) and mean intraocular pressure at diagnosis was 27.7±18.7 mmHg (range, 10-62 mmHg). Normalization of anterior segment anatomy was achieved with aqueous suppression and cycloplegia (one eye); Nd:YAG capsulotomy (four eyes); pars plana vitrectomy alone (two eyes) or with lensectomy (one eye), and pars plana vitrectomy with intraocular lens explanation (two eyes). Mean final intraocular pressure was 14.1±6.0 mmHg at a mean follow-up of 9.1±7.8 months after the development of aqueous misdirection (range, 1-23 months). CONCLUSIONS: Aqueous misdirection may develop days to months after glaucoma drainage device implantation. In this series, there was a poor response to medical therapy, and normalization in anterior chamber depth required aggressive laser and surgical therapy.
Department of Ophthalmology, The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, USA.
Classification:
12.8.2 With tube implant or other drainage devices (Part of: 12 Surgical treatment > 12.8 Filtering surgery)
