advertisement
PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of topical bimatoprost 0.03% with latanoprost 0.005%. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked clinical trial. METHODS: After washout of glaucoma medications, ocular hypertension or glaucoma patients were randomly assigned to once-daily bimatoprost 0.03% (n = 133) or latanoprost 0.005% (n = 136) for six months. The primary outcome measure was mean change from baseline IOP (8 a.m., 12 p.m., 4 p.m.). Secondary measures included mean IOP, ophthalmological examination, adverse events, and the percentage of patients reaching specific target IOPs. RESULTS: Mean change from baseline IOP was significantly greater for bimatoprost patients than for latanoprost patients at all measurements on each study visit; 1.5 mmHg greater at 8 a.m. (p < 0.001), 2.2 mmHg greater at 12 p.m. (p < 0.001), and 1.2 mmHg greater at 4 p.m. (p = 0.004) at six months. At the end of the study, the percentage of patients achieving a ≥ 20% IOP decrease was 69-82% with bimatoprost and 50-62% with latanoprost (p ≤ 0.003). In addition, the distribution of patients achieving target pressures in each range (≤ 13 to ≤ 15 mmHg, > 15 to ≥ 18 mmHg, and > 18 mmHg) showed that bimatoprost produced lower target pressures compared with latanoprost at all times measured (p ≤ 0.026). Few patients were discontinued for adverse events (six on bimatoprost; five on latanoprost). On ophthalmological examination, conjunctival hyperemia (p < 0.001) and eyelash growth (p = 0.064) were more common in bimatoprost patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bimatoprost is more effective than latanoprost in lowering IOP. Both drugs were well tolerated, with few discontinuations for adverse events.
Dr. R.S. Noecker, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
11.4 Prostaglandins (Part of: 11 Medical treatment)