advertisement
Abstract #15258 Published in IGR 8-4
Relative risk of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss in patients enrolled and not enrolled in a prospective longitudinal study
Henson DB; Shambhu SArchives of Ophthalmology 2006; 124: 1405-1408
See also comment(s) by Jennifer Burr •
OBJECTIVE: To establish the relative risk of progressive visual field loss in a sample of glaucomatous eyes enrolled in a prospective longitudinal study vs a matched sample of eyes not enrolled in a study. METHODS: The first visual field records of 66 glaucomatous eyes enrolled in a prospective longitudinal study (mean follow-up time, 3.4 years; mean number of visual field tests, 8.3) were matched to 66 eyes from patients not enrolled in a study (mean follow-up time, 3 years; mean number of visual field tests, 3.7). Eyes were matched on the basis of (1) time of enrollment, (2) length of follow-up, and (3) the extent and spatial pattern of visual field loss. Linear regression of global visual field indexes was used to measure change and the relative risk of progression was calculated for a series of progression criteria sample. RESULTS: The relative risk of progressive visual field loss was on average 368% (range, 209%-673%) higher in the eyes not enrolled in a prospective longitudinal study. CONCLUSION: Selection bias may reduce the risk of progressive visual field loss in patients enrolled in longitudinal studies.
Dr. D.B. Henson, School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, England. david.henson@manchester.ac.uk
Classification:
6.20 Progression (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods)
6.6.2 Automated (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods > 6.6 Visual field examination and other visual function tests)