advertisement
Abstract #19914 Published in IGR 9-4
Calibration errors of Goldmann tonometers in a tertiary eye care centre
Chuo JY; Mikelberg FSCanadian Journal of Ophthalmology 2007; 42: 712-714
See also comment(s) by Arthur Sit •
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the calibration errors of all Goldmann applanation tonometers used clinically in the Vancouver General Hospital/University of British Columbia (VGH/UBC) Eye Care Centre. METHODS: All Goldmann tonometers used for patient care in the VGH/UBC Eye Care Centre were individually assessed for calibration errors. The tonometers were checked according to the Haag-Streit method using a standard calibration weight bar at three pressure levels (0, 20, 60 mmHg). Calibration errors were classified into three categories: ± 0.5 mmHg, ± 1.0 mmHg, and ± 1.5 mmHg or more. Ophthalmologists using tonometers with calibration errors > ± 1.0 mmHg were notified, with the suggestion that the tonometers be returned to the manufacturer for recalibration. RESULTS: A total of 25 tonometers were evaluated. At the 20-mmHg level, 17 (68%) fell within the manufacturer's recommended calibration range of ± 0.5 mmHg, and two (8%) had errors of ± 1.0 mmHg, resulting in 19 tonometers (76%) with errors of ± 1.0 mmHg. Six tonometers (24%) were identified as having calibration errors greater than ± 1.0 mmHg. INTERPRETATION: Calibration error of ± 1.0 mmHg or less is clinically acceptable. Seventy-six percent of the Goldmann applanation tonometers in the Eye Care Centre were in the acceptable calibration range. As the number of acceptably calibrated tonometers was high, despite the infrequency of recent calibration, we feel that monthly evaluation of Goldmann tonometers is suitable.
Dr. J.Y. Chuo, Department of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. jeanchuo1@yahoo.ca
Classification:
6.1.1 Devices, techniques (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods > 6.1 Intraocular pressure measurement; factors affecting IOP)
