Toggle navigation
About
Abstract
Editorial Board
Publication Schedule
Subscription & Newsletter
Contact
Issue
19-1
Table of Contents
Editors Selection
Glaucoma Dialogue
Glaucoma Opinion
Abstracts
Abstracts
Abstracted Journals
Classification List
Index of Authors
Search
Home
Abstracts
Index of Authors
Author #54100
advertisement
Virgili G
24
Showing records 1 to 24 |
Display all abstracts from
Virgili G
74078
Comparison of Clinical Trial and Systematic Review Outcomes for the 4 Most Prevalent Eye Diseases
Saldanha IJ
JAMA ophthalmology
2017; 135: 933-940
74579
STARD 2015 was reproducible in a large set of studies on glaucoma
Virgili G
PLoS ONE
2017; 12: e0186209
74251
Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: secondary analyses of the GATE study
Virgili G
British Journal of Ophthalmology
2018; 102: 604-610
74579
STARD 2015 was reproducible in a large set of studies on glaucoma
Michelessi M
PLoS ONE
2017; 12: e0186209
74251
Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: secondary analyses of the GATE study
Michelessi M
British Journal of Ophthalmology
2018; 102: 604-610
74078
Comparison of Clinical Trial and Systematic Review Outcomes for the 4 Most Prevalent Eye Diseases
Lindsley K; Do DV
JAMA ophthalmology
2017; 135: 933-940
74579
STARD 2015 was reproducible in a large set of studies on glaucoma
Miele A
PLoS ONE
2017; 12: e0186209
74251
Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: secondary analyses of the GATE study
Cook J; Boachie C
British Journal of Ophthalmology
2018; 102: 604-610
74579
STARD 2015 was reproducible in a large set of studies on glaucoma
Oddone F
PLoS ONE
2017; 12: e0186209
74078
Comparison of Clinical Trial and Systematic Review Outcomes for the 4 Most Prevalent Eye Diseases
Chuck RS
JAMA ophthalmology
2017; 135: 933-940
74251
Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: secondary analyses of the GATE study
Burr J
British Journal of Ophthalmology
2018; 102: 604-610
74579
STARD 2015 was reproducible in a large set of studies on glaucoma
Crescioli G
PLoS ONE
2017; 12: e0186209
74078
Comparison of Clinical Trial and Systematic Review Outcomes for the 4 Most Prevalent Eye Diseases
Meyerle C
JAMA ophthalmology
2017; 135: 933-940
74251
Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: secondary analyses of the GATE study
Banister K
British Journal of Ophthalmology
2018; 102: 604-610
74078
Comparison of Clinical Trial and Systematic Review Outcomes for the 4 Most Prevalent Eye Diseases
Jones LS
JAMA ophthalmology
2017; 135: 933-940
74579
STARD 2015 was reproducible in a large set of studies on glaucoma
Fameli V
PLoS ONE
2017; 12: e0186209
74078
Comparison of Clinical Trial and Systematic Review Outcomes for the 4 Most Prevalent Eye Diseases
Coleman AL
JAMA ophthalmology
2017; 135: 933-940
74251
Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: secondary analyses of the GATE study
Garway-Heath DF
British Journal of Ophthalmology
2018; 102: 604-610
74579
STARD 2015 was reproducible in a large set of studies on glaucoma
Lucenteforte E
PLoS ONE
2017; 12: e0186209
74251
Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: secondary analyses of the GATE study
Bourne RRA
British Journal of Ophthalmology
2018; 102: 604-610
74078
Comparison of Clinical Trial and Systematic Review Outcomes for the 4 Most Prevalent Eye Diseases
Jampel HD
JAMA ophthalmology
2017; 135: 933-940
74251
Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: secondary analyses of the GATE study
Asorey Garcia A
British Journal of Ophthalmology
2018; 102: 604-610
74078
Comparison of Clinical Trial and Systematic Review Outcomes for the 4 Most Prevalent Eye Diseases
Dickersin K; Virgili G
JAMA ophthalmology
2017; 135: 933-940
74251
Diagnostic accuracy of optical coherence tomography for diagnosing glaucoma: secondary analyses of the GATE study
Ramsay CR; Azuara-Blanco A
British Journal of Ophthalmology
2018; 102: 604-610
Issue
19-1
Table of Contents
Editor's Selection
PDF
EPUB
Change Issue
24-1 (2024)
23-4 (2023)
23-3 (2023)
23-2 (2023)
23-1 (2022)
22-4 (2022)
22-3 (2022)
22-2 (2021)
22-1 (2021)
21-4 (2021)
21-3 (2021)
21-2 (2021)
21-1 (2020)
20-4 (2020)
20-3 (2020)
20-2 (2019)
20-1 (2019)
19-4 (2019)
19-3 (2018)
19-2 (2018)
19-1 (2018)
18-4 (2017)
18-3 (2017)
18-2 (2017)
18-1 (2017)
17-4 (2016)
17-3 (2016)
17-2 (2016)
17-1 (2016)
16-4 (2015)
16-3 (2015)
16-2 (2015)
16-1 (2014)
15-4 (2014)
15-3 (2014)
15-2 (2013)
15-1 (2013)
14-4 (2013)
14-3 (2013)
14-2 (2013)
14-1 (2012)
13-4 (2012)
13-3 (2011)
13-2 (2011)
13-1 (2011)
12-4 (2011)
12-3 (2010)
12-2 (2010)
12-1 (2010)
11-4 (2010)
11-3 (2009)
11-2 (2009)
11-1 (2009)
10-4 (2009)
10-3 (2008)
10-2 (2008)
10-1 (2008)
9-4 (2008)
9-3 (2007)
9-2 (2007)
9-1 (2007)
8-4 (2007)
8-3 (2006)
8-2 (2006)
8-1 (2006)
7-3 (2006)
7-2 (2005)
7-1 (2005)
6-3 (2005)
6-2 (2004)
6-1 (2004)
5-3 (2004)
5-2 (2003)
5-1 (2003)
4-3 (2003)
4-2 (2002)
4-1 (2002)
3-3 (2002)
3-2 (2001)
3-1 (2001)
2-3 (2001)
2-2 (2000)
2-1 (2000)
1-3 (2000)
1-2 (1999)
1-1 (1999)
advertisement