advertisement
Ali MH 8
Showing records 1 to 8 | Display all abstracts from Ali MH82230 Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)
Komma S
BMJ open ophthalmology 2019; 4: e000258
81869 Schiotz Scleral Intraocular Pressure Readings Predict Goldmann Applanation Readings Better Than Rebound Tonometry
Senthil S
Cornea 2019; 38: 1117-1123
82230 Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)
Chhablani J
BMJ open ophthalmology 2019; 4: e000258
81869 Schiotz Scleral Intraocular Pressure Readings Predict Goldmann Applanation Readings Better Than Rebound Tonometry
Chary R
Cornea 2019; 38: 1117-1123
82230 Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)
Ali MH
BMJ open ophthalmology 2019; 4: e000258
81869 Schiotz Scleral Intraocular Pressure Readings Predict Goldmann Applanation Readings Better Than Rebound Tonometry
Ali MH; Choudhari N
Cornea 2019; 38: 1117-1123
82230 Comparison of peripapillary and subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal versus primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) subjects using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)
Garudadri CS; Senthil S
BMJ open ophthalmology 2019; 4: e000258
81869 Schiotz Scleral Intraocular Pressure Readings Predict Goldmann Applanation Readings Better Than Rebound Tonometry
Badakere S; Krishnamurthy R; Dikshit S; Garudadri C
Cornea 2019; 38: 1117-1123
