advertisement

WGA Rescources

6.1.1 Devices, techniques (14)

Showing records 1 to 14

Display all abstracts in classification 6.1.1 Devices, techniques

Search within classification 6.1.1 Devices, techniques
26411 Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties between healthy blacks and whites using the ocular response analyzer
Leite MT; Alencar LM; Gore C; Weinreb RN; Sample PA; Zangwill LM; Medeiros FA
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2010; 150: 163-168
26604 Minimal cross-infection risk through Icare rebound tonometer probes: A useful tool for IOP-screenings in developing countries
Briesen S; Schulze Schwering M; Roberts H; Kollmann M; Stachs O; Behrend D; Schafer St; Guthoff R
Eye 2010; 24: 1279-1283
26352 Comparison of three methods of intraocular pressure measurement and their relation to central corneal thickness
Carbonaro F; Andrew T; Mackey DA; Spector TD; Hammond CJ
Eye 2010; 24: 1165-1170
26789 A clinical comparison of dynamic contour tonometry versus goldmann applanation tonometry
Yalcinbayir O; Baykara M; Atasoy A; Ozcetin H
Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging 2010; 41: 437-442
26349 Evaluation of the intraocular pressure measured with the ocular response analyzer
Ogbuehi KC; Almubrad TM
Current Eye Research 2010; 35: 587-596
26526 What to do if the intraocular pressure measurement does not appear reliable?
Hamard P
Journal Français d'Ophtalmologie 2010; 33: 279-284
26674 Determination of corneal elasticity coefficient using the ORA database
Avetisov SE; Novikov IA; Bubnova IA; Antonov AA; Siplivyi VI
Journal of Refractive Surgery 2010; 26: 520-524
26573 Reproducibility of ocular response analyzer measurements and their correlation with central corneal thickness
Wasielica-Poslednik J; Berisha F; Aliyeva S; Pfeiffer N; Hoffmann EM
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2010; 248: 1617-1622
26697 iCare rebound tonometry for pediatric glaucomamanagement-clinic and home settings
Flemmons M; Dzau J; Freedman S
Journal of AAPOS 2010; 14: 17
26633 Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry in Chinese normal subjects
Fang Y; Pan Y-Z; Qiao R-H; Li M; Cai Y; Liu L-N
Chinese Ophthalmic Research 2010; 28: 550-554
26667 Evaluation of a contact lens-embedded sensor for intraocular pressure measurement
Twa MD; Roberts CJ; Karol HJ; Mahmoud AM; Weber PA; Small RH
Journal of Glaucoma 2010; 19: 382-390
26606 Untreated 24-h intraocular pressures measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry vs nighttime supine pressures with Perkins applanation tonometry
Quaranta L; Konstas AGP; Rossetti L; Garcia-Feijoo J; O'Brien C; Nasr MB; Fogagnolo P; Demos CM; Stewart JA; Stewart WC
Eye 2010; 24: 1252-1258
26353 Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude variations during the Valsalva maneuver
Aykan U; Erdurmus M; Yilmaz B; Bilge AH
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2010; 248: 1183-1186
26340 Differences between Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in pseudoexfoliation syndrome
Grammenandi E; Detorakis ET; Pallikaris IG; Tsilimbaris MK
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2010; 38: 444-448

Issue 12-3

Change Issue


advertisement

Oculus