advertisement
6.1.1 Devices, techniques (15)
Showing records 1 to 15
Display all abstracts in classification 6.1.1 Devices, techniques
Search within classification 6.1.1 Devices, techniques27231 Repeated intraocular pressure measurement in awake Lewis Rats does not bias retinal ganglion cell survival
Cuny CS; Joachim SC; Gramlich OW; Gottschling PF; Pfeiffer N; Grus FH
Current Eye Research 2010; 35: 1034-1039
27397 Variability in the calibration error of the goldmann applanation tonometer
Choudhari NS; Jadhav V; George R; Vijaya L
Journal of Glaucoma 2010;
27345 Evaluation of agreement between intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry and Goldmann correlated intraocular pressure by Reichert's ocular response analyser
Ehrlich JR; Haseltine S; Shimmyo M; Radcliffe NM
Eye 2010; 24: 1555-1560
27422 Intraocular pressure values obtained by ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometry, and Goldmann tonometry in keratokonic corneas
Bayer A; Sahin A; Hurmeric V; Ozge G
Journal of Glaucoma 2010; 19: 540-545
27431 Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements
Xu G; Chiu Lam DS; Leung C
Journal of Glaucoma 2010;
27411 Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry
Wang J; Cayer M-M; Descovich D; Kamdeu-Fansi A; Harasymowycz PJ; Li G; Lesk MR
Journal of Glaucoma 201;
27162 A New Noncontact Tonometer Using Corneal Photoelasticity: Porcine Eye Study
Hwang H; Kim M; Park C
Ophthalmic Research 2010; 45: 169-173
27012 Ocular response analyzer and goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study of findings.
Bayoumi NH; Bessa AS; El Massry AA
Journal of Glaucoma 2010; 19: 627-631
27308 Tonometry methods in the pediatric emergency department
Yamamoto LG; Young DA
Pediatric Emergency Care 2010; 26: 678-683
27294 Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP): Comparison in the same eyes after subsequent medical normalization of IOP
Yoo C; Eom YS; Kim YY
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2010; 248: 1611-1616
27291 Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the Diaton tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry
Li Y; Shi J; Duan X; Fan F
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2010; 248: 1765-1770
27024 Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry following penetrating keratoplasty.
Kandarakis A; Soumplis V; Pitsas C; Kandarakis S; Halikias J; Karagiannis D
Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 2010; 45: 489-493
27078 Comparison of ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer.
Renier C; Zeyen T; Fieuws S; Vandenbroeck S; Stalmans I
International Ophthalmology 2010; 30: 651-659
27549 Comparison of the IOPen and iCare rebound tonometers with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population
Jorge J; Fernandes P; Queiros A; Ribeiro P; Garces C; Gonzalez-Meijome JM
Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians 2010; 30: 108-112
27503 Measuring accurate IOPs: Does correction factor help or hurt?
Gunvant P; Newcomb RD; Kirstein EM; Malinovsky VE; Madonna RJ; Meetz RE
Clinical Ophthalmology 2010; 4: 611-616