advertisement
6.1.1 Devices, techniques (57)
Showing records 1 to 25
Display all abstracts in classification 6.1.1 Devices, techniques
Search within classification 6.1.1 Devices, techniques72979 Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Properties between Indian and Chinese Adults
Chua J
Ophthalmology 2017; 124: 1271-1279
73074 The Sensimed Triggerfish contact lens sensor: efficacy, safety, and patient perspectives
Dunbar GE
Clinical Ophthalmology 2017; 11: 875-882
72600 Twenty-four hour intraocular pressure monitoring with the SENSIMED Triggerfish contact lens: effect of body posture during sleep
Beltran-Agulló L
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 101: 1323-1328
72642 Monitoring daily intraocular pressure fluctuations with self-tonometry in healthy subjects
Quérat L
Acta Ophthalmologica 2017; 95: 525-529
72771 Evaluation of a New Rebound Self-tonometer, Icare HOME: Comparison With Goldmann Applanation Tonometer
Takagi D
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 613-618
72815 Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects
Kato Y
International Ophthalmology 2018; 38: 687-696
72998 Using CorvisST tonometry to assess glaucoma progression
Matsuura M
PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0176380
73054 Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation
McCafferty S
Clinical Ophthalmology 2017; 11: 835-840
72999 Influence of eye biometrics and corneal micro-structure on noncontact tonometry
Jesus DA
PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0177180
72705 Comparison of self-measured diurnal intraocular pressure profiles using rebound tonometry between primary angle closure glaucoma and primary open angle glaucoma patients
Tan S
PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0173905
73047 Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma
Wachtl J
JAMA ophthalmology 2017; 135: 601-608
72979 Comparison of Corneal Biomechanical Properties between Indian and Chinese Adults
Nongpiur ME
Ophthalmology 2017; 124: 1271-1279
72600 Twenty-four hour intraocular pressure monitoring with the SENSIMED Triggerfish contact lens: effect of body posture during sleep
Buys YM
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 101: 1323-1328
72705 Comparison of self-measured diurnal intraocular pressure profiles using rebound tonometry between primary angle closure glaucoma and primary open angle glaucoma patients
Baig N
PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0173905
72999 Influence of eye biometrics and corneal micro-structure on noncontact tonometry
Majewska M
PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0177180
73047 Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma
Töteberg-Harms M
JAMA ophthalmology 2017; 135: 601-608
72642 Monitoring daily intraocular pressure fluctuations with self-tonometry in healthy subjects
Chen E
Acta Ophthalmologica 2017; 95: 525-529
73074 The Sensimed Triggerfish contact lens sensor: efficacy, safety, and patient perspectives
Shen BY
Clinical Ophthalmology 2017; 11: 875-882
72771 Evaluation of a New Rebound Self-tonometer, Icare HOME: Comparison With Goldmann Applanation Tonometer
Sawada A
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 613-618
72815 Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects
Nakakura S
International Ophthalmology 2018; 38: 687-696
72998 Using CorvisST tonometry to assess glaucoma progression
Hirasawa K
PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0176380
73054 Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation
Lim G
Clinical Ophthalmology 2017; 11: 835-840
72771 Evaluation of a New Rebound Self-tonometer, Icare HOME: Comparison With Goldmann Applanation Tonometer
Yamamoto T
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 613-618
73047 Correlation Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry, Uncorrected and Corrected Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Stage of Glaucoma
Frimmel S
JAMA ophthalmology 2017; 135: 601-608
73054 Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation
Duncan W
Clinical Ophthalmology 2017; 11: 835-840
