advertisement
6.1.1 Devices, techniques (10)
Showing records 1 to 10
Display all abstracts in classification 6.1.1 Devices, techniques
Search within classification 6.1.1 Devices, techniques19851 Measurement of intraocular pressure in experimental animals
Li Y-H; Duan X-C; Shi J-M
International Journal of Ophthalmology 2007; 7: 1087-1091
19872 What should we think? Is pneumotonometry still reliable?
Bresson-Dumont H; Lehoux A; Kponoume C; Santiago PY
Journal Français d'Ophtalmologie 2007; 30: 5 Pt 2 3S66-71
19914 Calibration errors of Goldmann tonometers in a tertiary eye care centre
Chuo JY; Mikelberg FS
Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 2007; 42: 712-714
19819 Comparing dynamic contour tonometry to Goldmann and hand-held tonometry in normal, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma populations
Eichenbaum KD; Mezej M; Eichenbaum JW
Annals of ophthalmology (Skokie, Ill.) 2007; 39: 41-49
19726 Estimation of intraocular pressure in rabbits using noncontact tonometer: A comparative evaluation with Schiotz tonometer
Gupta SK; Saxena R; Agarwal R; Galpalli ND; Srivastava S; Agrawal SS
Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology 2007; 29: 405-409
19946 Measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in chickens using a rebound tonometer: quantitative evaluation of variance due to position inaccuracies
Prashar A; Guggenheim JA; Erichsen JT; Hocking PM; Morgan JE
Experimental Eye Research 2007; 85: 563-571
20126 Clinical comparison of Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma
Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
Journal of Glaucoma 2007; 16: 694-699
20125 The clinical utility of dynamic contour tonometry and ocular pulse amplitude
Weizer JS; Asrani S; Stinnett SS; Herndon LW
Journal of Glaucoma 2007; 16: 700-703
20123 Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure
Broman AT; Congdon NG; Bandeen-Roche K; Quigley HA
Journal of Glaucoma 2007; 16: 581-588
20026 What Do We Measure with Various Techniques When Assessing IOP?
Robert YC
Survey of Ophthalmology 2007; 52: S105-108