advertisement
6.1.2 Fluctuation, circadian rhythms (8)
Showing records 1 to 8
Display all abstracts in classification 6.1.2 Fluctuation, circadian rhythms
Search within classification 6.1.2 Fluctuation, circadian rhythms26386 In vivo real-time intraocular pressure variations during LASIK flap creation
Chaurasia SS; Luengo Gimeno F; Tan K; Yu S; Tan DT; Beuerman RW; Mehta JS
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2010; 51: 4641-4645
26606 Untreated 24-h intraocular pressures measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry vs nighttime supine pressures with Perkins applanation tonometry
Quaranta L; Konstas AGP; Rossetti L; Garcia-Feijoo J; O'Brien C; Nasr MB; Fogagnolo P; Demos CM; Stewart JA; Stewart WC
Eye 2010; 24: 1252-1258
26328 Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Patterns are Not Repeatable in the Short Term in Healthy Individuals
Realini T; Weinreb RN; Wisniewski SR
Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 1700-1704
26579 The diurnal variation of intraocular pressure-the most important symptom for early detection and follow-up of the glaucomas
Draeger J
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2010; 248: 1367-1370
26758 Effect of different diurnal blood pressure profiles on severity of the open-angle glaucoma in treated hypertensive patients
Krasinska B; Karolczak-Kulesza M; Tykarski A; Pawlaczyk-Gabriel K; Niklas A; Krasinski Z; Gluszek J
Nadcisnienie Tetnicze 2010; 14: 128-141
26652 Can mean central corneal thickness and its 24-hour fluctuation influence fluctuation of intraocular pressure?
Fogagnolo P; Capizzi F; Orzalesi N; Figus M; Ferreras A; Rossetti L
Journal of Glaucoma 2010; 19: 418-423
26430 24-hour versus daytime intraocular pressure phasing in the management of patients with treated glaucoma
Moodie J; Wilde C; Rotchford AP; Vernon SA; King AJ
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2010; 94: 999-1002
26310 Twenty-four-hour ocular hypotensive effects of 0.0015% tafluprost and 0.005% latanoprost in healthy subjects
Mochizuki H; Itakura H; Yokoyama T; Takamatsu M; Kiuchi Y
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 2010; 54: 286-290