advertisement
6.6.2 Automated (9)
Showing records 1 to 9
Display all abstracts in classification 6.6.2 Automated
Search within classification 6.6.2 Automated9199 Standard perimetry
Anderson DR
Ophthalmology Clinics of North America 2003; 16: 205-212
9194 Intraocular pressure and visual field loss in primary angle closure and primary open angle glaucomas
Gazzard G; Foster PJ; Devereux JG; Oen F; Chew P; Khaw PT; Seah S
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2003; 87: 720-725
9196 The collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study: baseline visual field and test-retest variability.
Gillespie BW; Musch DC; Guire KE; Mills RP; Lichter PR; Janz NK; Wren PA; CIGTS Study Group
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2003; 44: 2613-2620
9201 Measuring visual field progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial
Heijl A; Leske C; Bengtsson B; Hussein M; EMGT Group
Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 2003; 81: 286-293
9191 Classification of visual field abnormalities in the ocular hypertension treatment study
Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Cello KE; Edwards MA; Bandermann SE; Kass MA; Gordon MO; Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group
Archives of Ophthalmology 2003; 121: 643-650
9192 Agreement between frequency doubling perimetry and static perimetry in eyes with high tension glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma
Kogure S; Toda Y; Crabb DP; Kashiwagi K; Fitzke FW; Tsukahara S
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2003; 87: 604-608
9195 A comparison of perimetric results with the Medmont and Humphrey perimeters
Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2003; 87: 690-694
9197 A statistical model for the evaluation of sensory tests in glaucoma, depending on optic disc damage
Stroux A; Korth M; Jünemann A; Jonas JB; Horn F; Ziegler A; Martus P
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2003; 44: 2879-2884
9193 Interobserver agreement on visual field progression in glaucoma: a comparison of methods
Viswanathan AC; Crabb DP; McNaught AI; Westcott MC; Kamal D; Garway-Heath DF; Fitzke FW; Hitchings RA
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2003; 87: 726-730
