advertisement
6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.) (14)
Showing records 1 to 14
Display all abstracts in classification 6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.)
Search within classification 6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.)20725 Effect of optical media changes on white-on-white Humphry field analyser perimetry and frequency doubling technology perimetry
Shen J-Q; Hitchings RA; Fitzke FW
International Journal of Ophthalmology 2008; 8: 10-12
20850 A Comparison Among Humphrey Field Analyzer, Microperimetry, and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph in the Evaluation of Macula in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
Öztürk F; Fatma Yavas G; Küsbeci T; Samet Ermis S
Journal of Glaucoma 2008; 17: 118-121
20803 Humphrey Matrix Perimetry in Optic Nerve and Chiasmal Disorders: Comparison with Humphrey SITA Standard 24-2
Huang CQ; Carolan J; Redline D; Taravati P; Woodward KR; Johnson CA; Wall M; Keltner JL
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2008; 49: 917-923
20819 Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields
Capris P; Autuori S; Capris E; Papadia M
European Journal of Ophthalmology 2008; 18: 182-190
20793 Diagnostic accuracy of the matrix 24-2 and original N-30 frequency-doubling technology tests compared with standard automated perimetry
Racette L; Medeiros FA; Zangwill LM; Ng D; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2008; 49: 954-960
20830 Sensitivity and specificity of the humphrey matrix to detect homonymous hemianopias
Taravati P; Woodward KR; Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Redline D; Carolan J; Huang CQ; Wall M
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2008; 49: 924-928
20699 Comparison between indices of Humphrey matrix and Humphrey perimetry in early glaucoma patients and normal subjects
Hong S; Yeom HY; Kim CY; Seong GJ
Annals of ophthalmology (Skokie, Ill.) 2007; 39: 318-320
20697 Comparison of an automated confrontation testing device versus finger counting in the detection of field loss
Bass SJ; Cooper J; Feldman J; Horn D
Optometry 2007; 78: 390-395
20577 Correlating nerve fibre layer defects spatially with functional loss
Schiefer U; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Nevalainen J; Besch D
Eye 2007; 21: S25-S28
20465 Agreement and correlation between the frequency doubling perimetry and the blue-yellow perimetry in glaucoma: No support for selective damage
Magacho L; Reis R; Magacho B; Avila MP
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia 2007; 70: 509-512
20822 Rarebit perimetry and frequency doubling technology in patients with ocular hypertension
Corallo G; Iester M; Scotto R; Calabria G; Traverso CE
European Journal of Ophthalmology 2008; 18: 205-211
20303 Relationship between second-generation frequency doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma
Zarkovic A; Mora J; McKelvie J; Gamble G
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2007; 35: 808-811
20832 Stratus-OCT imaging in early glaucomatous and in ocular hypertensive patients with and without frequency-doubling technology abnormalities
Brusini P; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Parisi L; Felletti M; Salvetat ML
Eye 2008; 22: 406-413
20528 Spatiotemporal independent component analysis for the detection of functional responses in cat retinal images.
Barriga ES; Pattichis M; Ts'o D; Abramoff M; Kardon R; Kwon Y; Soliz P
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2007; 26: 1035-1045
