advertisement
6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.) (11)
Showing records 1 to 11
Display all abstracts in classification 6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.)
Search within classification 6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.)15382 Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma
Harwerth RS; Carter-Dawson L; Shen F; Smith EL III; Crawford ML
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 1999; 40: 2242-2250
15383 Progressive visual field defects from experimental glaucoma: measurements with white and colored stimuli
Harwerth RS; Smith EL III; Chandler M
Optometry and Vision Science 1999; 76: 558-570
15405 Spatial relationship of motion automated perimetry and optic disc topography in patients with glaucomatous optic neuropathy
Bosworth CF; Sample PA; Williams JM; Zangwill LM; Lee B; Weinreb RN
Journal of Glaucoma 1999; 8: 281-289
15406 Can the current oculokinetic perimetry chart be improved?
Chia W-LA; Goldberg I
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 1999; 27: 312-317
15407 Evaluation of oculokinetic perimetry
Chia W-LA; Goldberg I; Bauman A
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 1999; 27: 306-311
15408 Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24-2 stimulus presentation pattern
Johnson CA; Cioffi GA; Van Buskirk EM
Optometry and Vision Science 1999; 76: 571-581
15409 Testing for glaucoma with the spatial frequency doubling illusion
Maddess T; Goldberg I; Dobinson J; Wine S; Welsh AH; James AC
Vision Research 1999; 39: 4258-4273
15410 Testing for glaucoma with the frequency-doubling illusion in the whole, macular and eccentric visual fields
Maddess T; Severt WL
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology 1999; 27: 194-196
15411 Achromatic and short-wavelength automated perimetry in patients with glaucomatous large cups
Mansberger SL; Sample PA; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN
Archives of Ophthalmology 1999; 117: 1473-1477
15412 Acquired colour vision defects in glaucoma-their detection and clinicalsignificance.
Pacheco-Cutillas M; Sahraie A; Edgar DF
British Journal of Ophthalmology 1999; 83: 1396-1402
15413 Random dot motion stimuli are more sensitive than light stimuli for detection of visual field loss in ocular hypertension patients
Wall M; Jennisch CS
Optometry and Vision Science 1999; 76: 550-557
