advertisement
6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.) (14)
Showing records 1 to 14
Display all abstracts in classification 6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.)
Search within classification 6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.)52756 Relating retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and functional estimates of ganglion cell sampling density in healthy eyes and in early glaucoma
Redmond T; Anderson RS; Russell RA; Garway-Heath DF
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2013; 54: 2153-2162
52541 How does glaucoma look?: patient perception of visual field loss
Crabb DP; Smith ND; Glen FC; Burton R; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 1120-1126
52626 Sensitivity and specificity of flicker perimetry with Pulsar. Comparison with achromatic (white-on-white) perimetry in glaucoma patients
Göbel K; Erb C
Ophthalmologe 2013; 110: 141-145
52522 Pulsar perimetry. A review and new results
Gonzalez de la Rosa M; Gonzalez-Hernandez M
Ophthalmologe 2013; 110: 107-115
52665 Retinal neurovascular coupling in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension and its association with the level of glaucomatous damage
Gugleta K; Waldmann N; Polunina A; Kochkorov A; Katamay R; Flammer J; Orgul S
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2013; 251: 1577-1585
52555 Importance of perimetric differential diagnostics in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma
Erb C; Göbel K
Ophthalmologe 2013; 110: 116-130
52447 Correlation Between Intereye Difference in Visual Field Mean Deviation Values and Relative Afferent Pupillary Response as Measured by an Automated Pupillometer in Subjects With Glaucoma
Sarezky D; Krupin T; Cohen A; Stewart CW; Volpe NJ; Tanna AP
Journal of Glaucoma 2014; 23: 419-423
52781 Learning effect and test-retest variability of pulsar perimetry
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Parisi L; Johnson CA; Sampaolesi R; Brusini P
Journal of Glaucoma 2013; 22: 230-237
52691 Stereoacuity in mild, moderate and severe glaucoma
Lakshmanan Y; George RJ
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 2013; 33: 172-178
52728 Comparison of functional and morphological diagnostics in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects
Klamann MK; Grünert A; Maier AK; Gonnermann J; Joussen AM; Huber KK
Ophthalmic Research 2013; 49: 192-198
52807 Agreement between frequency-doubling technology perimetry and Heidelberg retinal tomography 3
Lee NY; Chung HJ; Park CK
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 2013; 57: 252-256
52888 Oculus-Spark perimetry compared with 3 procedures of glaucoma morphologic analysis (GDx, HRT, and OCT)
Gonzalez de la Rosa M; Gonzalez-Hernandez M; Sanchez-Garcia M; Rodriguez de la Vega R; Diaz-Aleman T; Pareja Rios A
European Journal of Ophthalmology 2013; 23: 316-323
52601 Flicker and conventional perimetry in comparison with structural changes in glaucoma
Dannheim F
Ophthalmologe 2013; 110: 131-140
53171 The role of hemifield sector analysis in multifocal visual evoked potential objective perimetry in the early detection of glaucomatous visual field defects
Mousa MF; Cubbidge RP; Al-Mansouri F; Bener A
Clinical Ophthalmology 2013; 7: 843-858
