advertisement
6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.) (14)
Showing records 1 to 14
Display all abstracts in classification 6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.)
Search within classification 6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.)55516 Association between visual field defects and quality of life in the United States
Qiu M; Wang SY; Singh K; Lin SC
Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 733-740
55350 Practical aspects of glaucoma perimetry
Weber J
Ophthalmologe 2013; 110: 1045-1050
55474 Structural and functional assessment by hemispheric asymmetry testing of the macular region in preperimetric glaucoma
Kawaguchi C; Nakatani Y; Ohkubo S; Higashide T; Kawaguchi I; Sugiyama K
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 2014; 58: 197-204
55665 Monochromatic Pupillometry in Unilateral Glaucoma Discloses no Adaptive Changes Subserved by the ipRGCs
Nissen C; Sander B; Milea D; Kolko M; Herbst K; Hamard P; Lund-Andersen H
Frontiers in neurology 2014; 5: 15
55636 Glaucomatous patterns in Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry data identified by unsupervised machine learning classifiers
Bowd C; Weinreb RN; Balasubramanian M; Lee I; Jang G; Yousefi S; Zangwill LM; Medeiros FA; Girkin CA; Liebmann JM; Goldbaum MH
PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e85941
55285 Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study
Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
JAMA ophthalmology 2014; 132: 77-83
55533 Night visual function of glaucoma patients with good photopic vision
Yukaw E; Masuda K; Matsuura T; Ogata N
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2013; 117: 808-811
55284 Visual field progression with frequency-doubling matrix perimetry and standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in healthy controls
Redmond T; O'Leary N; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; Artes PH; Chauhan BC
JAMA ophthalmology 2013; 131: 1565-1572
55224 Performance of the Moorfields motion displacement test for identifying eyes with glaucoma
Ong EL; Zheng Y; Aung T; Tan L; Cheng CY; Wong TY; How A
Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 88-92
55511 Evaluation of eye movements pattern during reading process in patients with glaucoma: a microperimeter study
Cerulli A; Cesareo M; Ciuffoletti E; Montanaro ML; Mancino R; Mirisola C; Sorge R; Cedrone C; Nucci C; Cerulli L
European Journal of Ophthalmology 2014; 24: 358-363
55632 Comparison of saccadic reaction time between normal and glaucoma using an eye movement perimeter
Mazumdar D; Pel JJ; Panday M; Asokan R; Vijaya L; Shantha B; George R; Van Der Steen J
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 2014; 62: 55-59
55643 Logistic regression analysis in the combination of diagnostic methods in glaucoma
Fasolo LR; Melo LA; Barbosa AS; Fernandes RA; Prata JA
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia 2013; 76: 341-344
55436 Predicting progression of glaucoma from rates of frequency doubling technology perimetry change
Meira-Freitas D; Tatham AJ; Lisboa R; Kuang TM; Zangwill LM; Weinreb RN; Girkin CA; Liebmann JM; Medeiros FA
Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 498-507
55690 New trends in visual rehabilitation with MP-1 microperimeter biofeedback: optic neural dysfunction
Verboschi F; Domanico D; Nebbioso M; Corradetti G; Zaccaria Scalinci S; Vingolo EM
Functional neurology 2013; 28: 285-291
