advertisement
9.3.4 Primary angle closure suspect (27)
Showing records 1 to 25
Display all abstracts in classification 9.3.4 Primary angle closure suspect
Search within classification 9.3.4 Primary angle closure suspect74705 Resident-performed laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure, primary angle closure suspects, and primary angle closure glaucoma
Kam JP
Clinical Ophthalmology 2017; 11: 1871-1876
74288 Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles
Rukmini AV
Scientific reports 2017; 7: 10190
74333 Residual Angle Closure One Year After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle Closure Suspects
Baskaran M
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 183: 111-117
74082 Proportion of undetected narrow angles or angle closure in cataract surgery referrals
Varma DK
Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 52: 366-372
74333 Residual Angle Closure One Year After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle Closure Suspects
Yang E
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 183: 111-117
74288 Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles
Najjar RP
Scientific reports 2017; 7: 10190
74082 Proportion of undetected narrow angles or angle closure in cataract surgery referrals
Kletke SN
Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 52: 366-372
74705 Resident-performed laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure, primary angle closure suspects, and primary angle closure glaucoma
Zepeda EM
Clinical Ophthalmology 2017; 11: 1871-1876
74082 Proportion of undetected narrow angles or angle closure in cataract surgery referrals
Rai AS
Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 52: 366-372
74333 Residual Angle Closure One Year After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle Closure Suspects
Trikha S
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 183: 111-117
74705 Resident-performed laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure, primary angle closure suspects, and primary angle closure glaucoma
Ding L
Clinical Ophthalmology 2017; 11: 1871-1876
74288 Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles
Atalay E
Scientific reports 2017; 7: 10190
74082 Proportion of undetected narrow angles or angle closure in cataract surgery referrals
Ahmed IIK
Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 52: 366-372
74288 Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles
Sharma S
Scientific reports 2017; 7: 10190
74333 Residual Angle Closure One Year After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle Closure Suspects
Kumar RS
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 183: 111-117
74705 Resident-performed laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure, primary angle closure suspects, and primary angle closure glaucoma
Wen JC
Clinical Ophthalmology 2017; 11: 1871-1876
74333 Residual Angle Closure One Year After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle Closure Suspects
Wong HT
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 183: 111-117
74288 Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles
Lock JZ
Scientific reports 2017; 7: 10190
74333 Residual Angle Closure One Year After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle Closure Suspects
He M
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 183: 111-117
74288 Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles
Baskaran M
Scientific reports 2017; 7: 10190
74333 Residual Angle Closure One Year After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle Closure Suspects
Chew PTK
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 183: 111-117
74288 Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles
Nongpiur M
Scientific reports 2017; 7: 10190
74333 Residual Angle Closure One Year After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle Closure Suspects
Foster PJ
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 183: 111-117
74288 Pupillary responses to light are not affected by narrow irido-corneal angles
Gooley JJ; Aung T
Scientific reports 2017; 7: 10190
74333 Residual Angle Closure One Year After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle Closure Suspects
Friedman D
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2017; 183: 111-117
