Toggle navigation
About
Abstract
Editorial Board
Publication Schedule
Subscription & Newsletter
Contact
Issues
This issue
19-1
All issues
Download PDF
Download EPUB
Editor's Selection
This issue
19-1
Browse by topic
Browse by contributor
Dialogue & Opinion
Abstracts
Abstracts
Search
Classification List
Abstracted Journals
Index of Authors
News & Reports
Home
Abstracts
Journals
Journal #2418
advertisement
Translational vision science & technology
36
Showing records 1 to 25 |
Display all abstracts in
Translational vision science & technology
74720
Optic Disc Image Subtraction as an Aid to Detect Glaucoma Progression
Amini N
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 14
74619
Exploring Test-Retest Variability Using High-Resolution Perimetry
Numata T
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 8
74708
Goldmann V Standard Automated Perimetry Underestimates Central Visual Sensitivity in Glaucomatous Eyes with Increased Axial Length
Yanagisawa M
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 13
74359
Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
McTrusty AD
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 4
74358
Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability
Murray IC
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 3
74720
Optic Disc Image Subtraction as an Aid to Detect Glaucoma Progression
Alizadeh R
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 14
74619
Exploring Test-Retest Variability Using High-Resolution Perimetry
Maddess T
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 8
74359
Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
Cameron LA
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 4
74358
Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability
Perperidis A
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 3
74708
Goldmann V Standard Automated Perimetry Underestimates Central Visual Sensitivity in Glaucomatous Eyes with Increased Axial Length
Murata H
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 13
74358
Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability
Cameron LA
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 3
74619
Exploring Test-Retest Variability Using High-Resolution Perimetry
Matsumoto C
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 8
74708
Goldmann V Standard Automated Perimetry Underestimates Central Visual Sensitivity in Glaucomatous Eyes with Increased Axial Length
Matsuura M
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 13
74359
Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
Perperidis A
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 4
74720
Optic Disc Image Subtraction as an Aid to Detect Glaucoma Progression
Parivisutt N
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 14
74708
Goldmann V Standard Automated Perimetry Underestimates Central Visual Sensitivity in Glaucomatous Eyes with Increased Axial Length
Fujino Y
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 13
74619
Exploring Test-Retest Variability Using High-Resolution Perimetry
Okuyama S
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 8
74358
Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability
McTrusty AD
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 3
74359
Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
Brash HM
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 4
74720
Optic Disc Image Subtraction as an Aid to Detect Glaucoma Progression
Kim E
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 14
74708
Goldmann V Standard Automated Perimetry Underestimates Central Visual Sensitivity in Glaucomatous Eyes with Increased Axial Length
Hirasawa K
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 13
74720
Optic Disc Image Subtraction as an Aid to Detect Glaucoma Progression
Nouri-Mahdavi K
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 14
74358
Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability
Brash HM
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 3
74619
Exploring Test-Retest Variability Using High-Resolution Perimetry
Hashimoto S
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 8
74359
Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
Tatham AJ
Translational vision science & technology
2017; 6: 4
«
1
2
»
Issue
19-1
Table of Contents
Editor's Selection
PDF
EPUB
Change Issue
26-1
25-4
25-3
25-2
25-1
24-4
24-3
24-1/2
23-4
23-3
23-2
23-1
22-4
22-3
22-2
22-1
21-4
21-3
21-2
21-1
20-4
20-3
20-2
20-1
19-4
19-3
19-2
19-1
18-4
18-3
18-2
18-1
17-4
17-3
17-2
17-1
16-4
16-3
16-2
16-1
15-4
15-3
15-2
15-1
14-4
14-3
14-2
14-1
13-4
13-3
13-2
13-1
12-4
12-3
12-2
12-1
11-4
11-3
11-2
11-1
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
9-4
9-3
9-2
9-1
8-4
8-3
8-2
8-1
7-3
7-2
7-1
6-3
6-2
6-1
5-3
5-2
5-1
4-3
4-2
4-1
3-3
3-2
3-1
2-3
2-2
2-1
1-3
1-2
1-1
advertisement
We would like to use Google Analytics to see which parts of the review are read. It is only used to count visits, never for advertising.
Privacy statement
Decline
Accept