advertisement
Translational vision science & technology 35
Showing records 1 to 25 | Display all abstracts in Translational vision science & technology74619 Exploring Test-Retest Variability Using High-Resolution Perimetry
Numata T
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 8
74708 Goldmann V Standard Automated Perimetry Underestimates Central Visual Sensitivity in Glaucomatous Eyes with Increased Axial Length
Yanagisawa M
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 13
74359 Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
McTrusty AD
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 4
74358 Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability
Murray IC
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 3
74720 Optic Disc Image Subtraction as an Aid to Detect Glaucoma Progression
Amini N
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 14
74358 Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability
Perperidis A
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 3
74708 Goldmann V Standard Automated Perimetry Underestimates Central Visual Sensitivity in Glaucomatous Eyes with Increased Axial Length
Murata H
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 13
74720 Optic Disc Image Subtraction as an Aid to Detect Glaucoma Progression
Alizadeh R
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 14
74619 Exploring Test-Retest Variability Using High-Resolution Perimetry
Maddess T
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 8
74359 Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
Cameron LA
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 4
74708 Goldmann V Standard Automated Perimetry Underestimates Central Visual Sensitivity in Glaucomatous Eyes with Increased Axial Length
Matsuura M
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 13
74359 Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
Perperidis A
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 4
74720 Optic Disc Image Subtraction as an Aid to Detect Glaucoma Progression
Parivisutt N
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 14
74358 Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability
Cameron LA
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 3
74619 Exploring Test-Retest Variability Using High-Resolution Perimetry
Matsumoto C
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 8
74358 Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability
McTrusty AD
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 3
74359 Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
Brash HM
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 4
74720 Optic Disc Image Subtraction as an Aid to Detect Glaucoma Progression
Kim E
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 14
74708 Goldmann V Standard Automated Perimetry Underestimates Central Visual Sensitivity in Glaucomatous Eyes with Increased Axial Length
Fujino Y
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 13
74619 Exploring Test-Retest Variability Using High-Resolution Perimetry
Okuyama S; Hashimoto S
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 8
74359 Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
Tatham AJ
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 4
74708 Goldmann V Standard Automated Perimetry Underestimates Central Visual Sensitivity in Glaucomatous Eyes with Increased Axial Length
Hirasawa K
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 13
74720 Optic Disc Image Subtraction as an Aid to Detect Glaucoma Progression
Nouri-Mahdavi K
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 14
74358 Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability
Brash HM; Tatham AJ
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 3
74619 Exploring Test-Retest Variability Using High-Resolution Perimetry
Nomoto H
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 8
