advertisement

Topcon

On Mouse and Glaucoma

Simon John (Winner WGA-Award 2005)

The mouse is an important model system for determining molecular mechanisms of glaucoma

There remains much to learn about the molecular etiology of glaucoma susceptibility. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that kill retinal ganglion cells, and understanding the role elevated IOP and other risk factors play in these processes will be important for designing new treatments to prevent vision loss.
The mouse is an ideal mammalian model for deciphering complex genetic interactions that underlie human glaucoma susceptibility.1-4 Glaucomatous mouse strains often develop glaucoma with a similar age-related progression as humans and they do so in a relatively short span of time (within 1 to 2 years). The mouse allows functional studies in a highly controlled experimental setting.

The mouse is well suited for deciphering mechanism of IOP elevation. The two types of outflow pathway present in humans, conventional and uveoscleral, exist in mice. Both species have an endothelial-lined canal of Schlemm (SC) and a trabecular meshwork (TM) consisting of layers of well-organized trabecular beams covered with endothelial-like trabecular cells. The biggest anatomic difference between mice and humans is that mice have a poorly developed ciliary muscle. Nevertheless, the prostaglandin analog Latanaprost lowers mouse IOP as it does in humans and the effects of adenosine receptors on IOP are similar between the two species.5,6 The documented simi-
larities between mice and people in drainage structure anatomy, in functional responses to drugs that inhibit aqueous production and facilitate outflow, and in values for various outflow parameters indicate that mice are a suitable models for studying IOP and its glaucoma-associated elevation.

There are two classes of mouse models relevant to glaucomatous neurodegeneration, experimentally induced and inherited. The strength of experimentally induced glaucoma models is the ability to induce chronic elevated IOP in genetically manipulated mice at will, allowing relatively short-term experiments. However, the induced neurodegeneration may have at least some mechanistic differences to inherited glaucoma. Although experiments involving inherited forms of mouse glaucoma are more time-consuming, the outcomes are more likely to accurately model human glaucoma, which has a genetic component. Optic nerve head excavation, a hallmark of human glaucoma, has been reported for only the inherited models. I will now provide a few brief examples of how my laboratory is using mice to understand glaucoma and suggest new treatments.
Primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) is a severe form of early onset glaucoma. Many PCG cases are caused by recessive mutations in the CYP1B1 gene.7,8 Striking phenotypic differences exist between individuals with CYP1B1 mutations suggesting involvement of further genes that modify the disease phenotype. Motivated by these observations, we identified a modifier gene that alters the phenotype in Cyp1b1 mutant mice.9 A mutant form of the tyrosinase gene (Tyr) was identified as an enhancer of angle dysgenesis. Cyp1b1 deficient mice that are also deficient for Tyr have more severe angle malformations than do mice carrying the Cyp1b1 mutation alone.9 Tyr also modified the phenotype in Foxc1 deficient mice, another gene whose equivalent in patients causes glaucoma. Tyrosinase produces L-DOPA and it was found that administration of L-DOPA in the drinking water substantially alleviated the developmental abnormalities of mice deficient in both CYP1B1 and tyrosinase.9 These experiments raise the pos-sibility that mutations in multiple genes contributing to developmental glaucomas affect DOPA levels.10 They demonstrate the utility of mice for defining multifactorial genetic interactions and for defining new pathways that are relevant to glaucoma.
We also study an inherited glaucoma in DBA/2J mice. These mice develop a pigmentary form of glaucoma characterized by a pigment liberating iris disease, increased IOP and optic nerve degeneration.11 The degree of pigment dispersion and iris destruction in DBA/2J mice is much greater than that observed in human patients with pigment dispersion syndrome (PDS). This is likely explained by the discovery that DBA/2J mice are mutant for two genes that can independently cause disease but when inherited together interact to cause the severe DBA/2J phenotype.12 In many human cases, PDS progresses to high IOP and causes pigmentary glaucoma. However, a significant number of PDS patients do not progress to high IOP. This implies that factors in addition to direct obstruction by pigment are necessary to cause sustained IOP elevation. It is likely that a genetic susceptibility of the drainage tissues to a pigment/cell debris-induced pathology is needed for glaucoma progression. Our mouse experiments provide strong evidence for such inherited susceptibility. The DBA/2J mutations have been introduced into a genetically different strain background. On this new genetic background, these genes induce the iris disease but there is rarely progression to high IOP or glaucoma.13 This strongly suggests that genetic susceptibility factors determine the likelihood of pigment dispersion progressing to elevated IOP, and these mouse strains will allow the study and understanding of some of these susceptibility factors.

DBA/2J glaucoma shows hallmarks of human glaucoma, including age-related variable progression of optic nerve atrophy in response to elevated IOP, asynchrony and optic nerve head excavation. In DBA/2 retinas with glaucoma, retinal ganglion cells and their axons are lost in 'fan-shaped' regions.14-16 The 'fan-shaped' areas of axon and cell loss are likely analogous to arcuate scotomas that occur in human glaucoma, since in the mouse the RGC axons do not curve across the retinal surface but radiate straight towards the optic nerve. Given these striking similarities, DBA/2 mice provide a valuable experimental system for deciphering molecular mechanisms of glaucomatous neurodegenertation, the effects of different risk factors, and for initially testing new treatments. Many groups are now using these mice for these purposes.

 It is likely that a genetic susceptibility of the drainage tissues to a pigment/cell debris-induced pathology is needed for glaucoma progression. Our mouse experiments provide strong evidence for such inherited susceptibility

We recently and serendipitously discovered a potent neuroprotective treatment that prevents glaucomatous damage in DBA/2J mice. This treatment involves administering a lethal dose of radiation to mice that is accompanied by syngeneic bone marrow transplant to prevent radiation-induced death.17 Importantly, this treatment is administered to young mice and remains protective until old age. This protection appears to extend to humans since the incidence of glaucoma is lower in atom bomb survivors.17 At this time, the mechanism(s) of neuroprotection are not known, and in its current form the treatment is not directly transferable to humans. Nevertheless, we are excited to study the process(es) involved in this radiation-induced neuroprotection as their understanding has great potential for guiding the development of powerful, new, neuroprotective measures. With in-
creased understanding it may be possible to eliminate the need for radiation but maintain the beneficial effect.
 

In conclusion, mouse glaucoma studies provide an important complement to those in humans and other species. The mouse glaucoma field is poised to be a key player in helping to transform our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanism of glaucoma susceptibility, initiation, and progression.

References

  1. Lindsey JD, Weinreb RN. Elevated intraocular pressure and transgenic applications in the mouse. J Glaucoma 2005; 14: 318-320

  2. John SWM. Mechanistic insights to Glaucoma Provided by Experimental Genetics: The Cogan Lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 2650-2661

  3. John SWM, Anderson MG, Smith RS. Mouse Genetics: A tool to help unlock the mechanisms of glaucoma. J Glaucoma 1999; 8: 400-412

  4. Goldblum D, Mittag T. Prospects for relevant glaucoma models with retinal ganglion cell damage in the rodent eye. Vision Res 2002; 42: 471-478

  5. Aihara M, Lindsey JD, Weinreb RN. Reduction of intraocular pressure in mouse eyes treated with latanoprost. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 146-150

  6. Yang H, Avila MY, Peterson-Yantorno K, Coca-Prados M, Stone RA, Jacobson KA, Civan MM. The cross-species A3 adenosine-receptor antagonist MRS 1292 inhibits adenosine-triggered human nonpigmented ciliary epithelial cell fluid release and reduces mouse intraocular pressure. Curr Eye Res 2005; 30: 747-754

  7. Stoilov I, Akarsu AN, Sarfarazi M. Identification of three different truncating mutations in cytochrome P4501B1 (CYP1B1) as the principal cause of primary congenital glaucoma (Buphthalmos) in families linked to the GLC3A locus on chromosome 2p21. Hum Mol Genet 1997; 6: 641-647

  8. Libby RT, Gould DB, Anderson MG, John SWM. Complex genetics of glaucoma susceptibility. Ann Rev Genom Hum Genet 2005; 6: 15-44

  9. Libby RT, Smith RS, Savinova OV, Zabaleta A, Martin JE, Gonzalez FJ, John SWM. Modification of ocular defects in mouse developmental glaucoma models by tyrosinase. Science 2003; 299: 1578-1581

  10. Gould DB, Smith RS, John SWM. Anterior Segment Development Relevant to Glaucoma. Int J Dev Biol 2004; 48: 1015-1029

  11. Libby RT, Anderson MG, Pang I-H, Savinova OV, Cosma IM, Snow A, Wilson LA, Clark AF, Smith RS, John SWM. Inherited glaucoma in DBA/2J mice: pertinent disease features for studying the neurodegeneration. Vis Neurosci 2005; 22: 637-648

  12. Anderson MG, Smith RS, Hawes NL, Zabaleta A, Chang B, Wiggs JL, John SWM. Mutations in genes encoding melanosomal proteins cause pigmentary glaucoma in DBA/2J mice. Nat Genet 2002; 30: 81-85

  13. Anderson MG, Libby RT, Mao M, Cosma IM, Wilson LA, Smith RS, John SWM. Genetic context determines susceptibility to intraocular pressure elevation in a mouse pigmentary glaucoma. BMC Biol 2006; 4: 20

  14. Jakobs TC, Libby RT, Ben Y, John SWM, Masland RH. Retinal ganglion cell degeneration is topological but not cell type specific in DBA/2J mice. J Cell Biol 2005; 171: 313-325

  15. Danias J, Lee KC, Zamora MF, Chen B, Shen F, Filippopoulos T, Su Y, Goldblum D, Podos SM, Mittag T. Quantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss in aging DBA/2NNia glaucomatous mice: comparison with RGC loss in aging C57/BL6 mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 5151-5162

  16. Schlamp CL, Li Y, Dietz JA, Janssen KT, Nickells RW. Progressive ganglion cell loss and optic nerve degeneration in DBA/2J mice is variable and asymmetric. BMC Neurosci 2006; 7: 66

  17. Anderson MG, Libby RT, Gould DB, Smith RS, John SWM. High-dose Radiation with Bone Marrow Transfer Prevents Neurodegeneration in an Inherited Glaucoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102: 4566-4571

Issue 8-4

Change Issue


advertisement

WGA Rescources