advertisement
Highlights from the WGA Consensus Meeting on Intraocular
Pressure
May 5, 2007, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
The Intraocular Pressure consensus reached a crescendo with the stimulating
and provocative meeting held in Fort Lauderdale on May 5, 2007. The resulting
consensus points and documents will be published in a forthcoming book that
should be available at the time of the World Glaucoma Congress in Singapore.
In the meantime, a few highlights of the IOP consensus are provided below.
Measurement of Intraocular Pressure
- Precision and agreement of tonometry devices should be reported
in a standardized format:
- Coefficient of repeatability (for intra-observer variation)
- Mean difference (or difference trend over range) and 95% limits
of agreement (for inter-observer and inter-instrument differences)
Comment: Under ideal circumstances for measurement, precision figures
reported for GAT are:
- Intraobserver variability: 2.5 mmHg (two readings by the same
observer will be within this figure for 95% of the subjects)
- Interobserver variability: ± 4mmHg (95% confidence limits either
side of mean difference between observers)
- In clinical practice these figures may be considerably higher
Intra-class correlation coefficients are not clinically useful
- Correction Nomograms that adjust GAT IOP based solely
on CCT are neither valid nor useful in individual patients.
Comment: a thick cornea gives rise to a greater probability of an
IOP being over-estimated (and a thin cornea of an IOP being under-estimated),
but the extent of measurement error in individual patients cannot be ascertained
from the CCT alone.
- Measurement of CCT is important in assessing risk for
incident glaucoma among ocular hypertensives in the clinical setting,
though the association between CCT and glaucoma risk maybe less strong
in the population at large.
Intraocular Pressure as a Risk Factor
- There is strong evidence to support higher mean
IOP as a significant risk factor for the development of glaucoma.
- There is strong evidence to support higher mean IOP as a
significant risk factor for glaucoma progression.
- There is currently insufficient evidence to support 24-hour
IOP fluctuation as a risk factor for glaucoma development or progression.
- There is currently insufficient evidence to support IOP variation
over periods longer than 24 hours as a risk factor for glaucoma development
and progression.
Target Intraocular Pressure
- The determination of a target IOP is based upon consideration
of the amount of glaucoma damage, the IOP at which the damage has occurred,
the life expectancy of the patient, and other factors including status
of the fellow eye and family history of severe glaucoma.
Comment: At present, the target IOP cannot be determined with any
certainty in a particular patient.
Comment: There is no validated algorithm for the determination of
a target IOP. This does not, however, negate its use in clinical practice.