advertisement
Update Your Consensus Knowledge
Intraocular Pressure
- Every ophthalmologist should know the consensus outcomes
- They are the solid global basis for the management of the glaucoma patients
- Please read them carefully and implement them in your practice
From time to time IGR will publish some of the consensus statements
as part of the WGA promulgation strategy.
Central Corneal Thickness
- On average, greater central corneal thickness (CCT) results in
overestimation of intraocular pressure (IOP) as measured by Goldmann
applanation tonometry (GAT).
Comment: The extent to which CCT contributes to the measurement error
(in relation to other factors) in individual patients under various
conditions has yet to be established.
Calibration of Goldman Applanation Tonometry
- Currently there are no data to support a specific frequency of
calibration verification for GAT.
Comment: The frequency for verification of GAT calibration of at least
twice yearly is suggested. For clinical research, a verification error >
± 1 mmHg should be the threshold to send the tonometer for
recalibration; the threshold for clinical practice may be higher and
requires a cost-benefit analysis.
Goldman Applanation Tonometry
- To obtain a GAT measurement, which is relatively unaffected by daytime
changes in CCT, the patient should desirably have been awake with
his/her eyes open for at least two hours prior to the measurement being
made.
- The wearing of contact lenses on the day when tonometry is performed may
lead to an artifactually raised IOP as measured by GAT.
Comment: Contact lens wearing patients should have tonometry performed
after having been awake, without contact lenses, for at least two hours
for contact lens-induced and diurnal corneal edema to resolve.
Intraocular Pressure
- There is strong evidence to support higher mean IOP as a significant
factor for the development of glaucoma.
- There is strong evidence to support higher mean IOP as a significant
risk factor for glaucoma progression.
- IOP is more variable in glaucomatous than in healthy eyes, but both
24-hour IOP fluctuation and IOP variation over periods longer than 24
hours tends to be correlated with mean IOP.
- There is currently insuffi cient evidence to support 24-hour IOP fl
uctuation as a risk factor for glaucoma development or progression.
Comment: 24-hour IOP measurements are comprised of day-time (diurnal) and
night-time (nocturnal) periods.
Comment: Diurnal IOP is generally highest
after awakening and decreases during the day-time period.
Comment: Posture is an important variable in the measurement of IOP; IOP
in the sitting position is generally lower than in the supine position.
- There is currently insuffi cient evidence to support IOP varia-tion over
periods longer than 24 hours as a risk factor for glaucoma development
and progression.
Target IOP
- The determination of a target IOP is based upon consideration of the
amount of glaucoma damage, the IOP at which the damage has occurred, and
the life expectancy of the patient, and other factors including status
of the fellow eye and family history of severe glaucoma.
Comment: At present, the target IOP is estimated and cannot be determined
with any certainty in a particular patient.
Comment: There is no
validated algorithm for the determination of a target IOP. This does
not, however, negate its use in clinical practice.
- It is recommended that the target IOP be recorded so that it is
accessible on subsequent patient visits.
- The use of a target IOP in glaucoma requires periodic re-evaluation.
Comment: This entails examination of the optic nerve and assessment of
visual function to detect glaucomatous progression, the effect of the
therapy upon the patients quality of life, and whether the patient has
developed any new systemic or ocular conditions that might affect the
risk/benefit ratio of therapy.
Comment: During the re-evaluation, it is
essential to determine whether the IOP target is appropriate and should
not be changed.