Top-eight Optometric Glaucoma Society Meeting
Orlando, Florida, USA November 9-11, 2009
Murray Fingeret and Michael Patella
Classic risk factors related to glaucoma development do not provide
accurate estimates of patient disability risk. (George Spaeth, Philadelphia,
PA, USA)
The likelihood that a patient will become disabled due to glaucoma
is a function of: (1) disease severity and duration; (2) selfcare capabilities
of the patient; (3) clinician skill; and (4) patient adaptability. (George
Spaeth, Philadelphia, PA, USA)
Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is the leading cause of irreversible
blindness in African Americans. Compared to Caucasians, POAG progresses
more rapidly and appears ten years earlier. Similarly, ocular hypertension
appears twelve years earlier with a greater rate of conversion to glaucoma.
(Christopher Girkin, Birmingham, AL, USA)
Changes in trabeculecetomy that have led to improved surgical outcomes
include use of a larger treatment area, posteriorly directed flow, tight
adjustable sutures, and a wide area of antimetablolite application.
(Peng T. Khaw, London, UK)
Chorioretinal lesions can produce visual field (VF) defects that
mimic a retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) pattern of loss. A unilateral
temporal hemianopsia represents a pituitary lesion until proven otherwise.
POAG can occur in the setting of dysmorphic optic nerves. (Louis Pasquale
Boston, MA, USA)
Disc hemorrhages are relatively common, occur early and are more
frequently seen in open angle than in angle closure glaucoma. If large
enough, hemorrhages may produce a focal compressive optic neuropathy.
(Louis Pasquale, Boston, MA, USA)
Ethnic differences in average RNFL thickness were recently found,
even taking into account effects of age, optic disc area, and signal
strength. (Murray Fingeret, New York, NY, USA)
Over the past decade, differences in Sita normals in different ethnic
groups were evaluated and nothing was found suggesting strong racial
effects. Approximately a quarter dB was found between groups which was
smaller than the inter-center differences seen in normals studies. More
recently, others have looked in an organized way and also concluded
that there is little difference in function. Still the differences were
not zero and may be statistically significant with greater numbers studied.
(Michael Patella, Dublin, CA, USA)