advertisement
Dai Y 22
Showing records 1 to 22 |
Display all abstracts from Dai Y70858 Primary angle closure glaucoma: What we know and what we don't knowSun X
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2017; 57: 26-45
70281 INFECTIOUS ENDOPHTHALMITIS AFTER GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANT SURGERY: Clinical Features, Microbial Spectrum, and OutcomesZheng CX
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) 2017; 37: 1160-1167
70258 A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherenceHark LA
Patient preference and adherence 2016; 10: 1739-1748
70858 Primary angle closure glaucoma: What we know and what we don't knowDai Y
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2017; 57: 26-45
70258 A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherenceJohnson DM
Patient preference and adherence 2016; 10: 1739-1748
70281 INFECTIOUS ENDOPHTHALMITIS AFTER GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANT SURGERY: Clinical Features, Microbial Spectrum, and OutcomesMoster MR; Khan MA
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) 2017; 37: 1160-1167
70258 A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherenceBerardi G
Patient preference and adherence 2016; 10: 1739-1748
70858 Primary angle closure glaucoma: What we know and what we don't knowChen Y; Yu DY
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2017; 57: 26-45
70281 INFECTIOUS ENDOPHTHALMITIS AFTER GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANT SURGERY: Clinical Features, Microbial Spectrum, and OutcomesChiang A
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) 2017; 37: 1160-1167
70258 A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherencePatel NS; Zeng L
Patient preference and adherence 2016; 10: 1739-1748
70858 Primary angle closure glaucoma: What we know and what we don't knowCringle SJ
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2017; 57: 26-45
70281 INFECTIOUS ENDOPHTHALMITIS AFTER GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANT SURGERY: Clinical Features, Microbial Spectrum, and OutcomesGarg SJ
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) 2017; 37: 1160-1167
70258 A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherenceDai Y
Patient preference and adherence 2016; 10: 1739-1748
70281 INFECTIOUS ENDOPHTHALMITIS AFTER GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANT SURGERY: Clinical Features, Microbial Spectrum, and OutcomesDai Y
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) 2017; 37: 1160-1167
70858 Primary angle closure glaucoma: What we know and what we don't knowChen J
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2017; 57: 26-45
70258 A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherenceMayro EL
Patient preference and adherence 2016; 10: 1739-1748
70858 Primary angle closure glaucoma: What we know and what we don't knowKong X
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2017; 57: 26-45
70281 INFECTIOUS ENDOPHTHALMITIS AFTER GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANT SURGERY: Clinical Features, Microbial Spectrum, and OutcomesWaisbourd M
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) 2017; 37: 1160-1167
70258 A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherenceWaisbourd M
Patient preference and adherence 2016; 10: 1739-1748
70858 Primary angle closure glaucoma: What we know and what we don't knowWang X
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2017; 57: 26-45
70258 A randomized, controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a glaucoma patient navigator to improve appointment adherenceKatz LJ
Patient preference and adherence 2016; 10: 1739-1748
70858 Primary angle closure glaucoma: What we know and what we don't knowJiang C
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2017; 57: 26-45
Issue 18-2
Change Issue
advertisement