advertisement
Craven ER 9
Showing records 1 to 9 | Display all abstracts from Craven ER112668 Interim Analysis of Clinical Outcomes with Open versus Closed Conjunctival Implantation of the XEN45 Gel Stent
McGlumphy EJ
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma 2024; 7: 116-122
113062 Phase 3, Randomized Study Comparing Intracameral Bimatoprost Implant 15 µg and Selective Laser Trabeculectomy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
Christie WC; Basha MM
Clinical Ophthalmology 2023; 17: 3023-3036
112668 Interim Analysis of Clinical Outcomes with Open versus Closed Conjunctival Implantation of the XEN45 Gel Stent
Do A; Du A
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma 2024; 7: 116-122
113062 Phase 3, Randomized Study Comparing Intracameral Bimatoprost Implant 15 µg and Selective Laser Trabeculectomy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
Ho Q
Clinical Ophthalmology 2023; 17: 3023-3036
112668 Interim Analysis of Clinical Outcomes with Open versus Closed Conjunctival Implantation of the XEN45 Gel Stent
Craven ER
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma 2024; 7: 116-122
113062 Phase 3, Randomized Study Comparing Intracameral Bimatoprost Implant 15 µg and Selective Laser Trabeculectomy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
Kim K; Craven ER
Clinical Ophthalmology 2023; 17: 3023-3036
112668 Interim Analysis of Clinical Outcomes with Open versus Closed Conjunctival Implantation of the XEN45 Gel Stent
Geyman LS; Shen L
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma 2024; 7: 116-122
113062 Phase 3, Randomized Study Comparing Intracameral Bimatoprost Implant 15 µg and Selective Laser Trabeculectomy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
Kolko M
Clinical Ophthalmology 2023; 17: 3023-3036
112668 Interim Analysis of Clinical Outcomes with Open versus Closed Conjunctival Implantation of the XEN45 Gel Stent
Schuman JS; Panarelli JF
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma 2024; 7: 116-122
