advertisement
Feuer WJ 38
Showing records 1 to 25 | Display all abstracts from Feuer WJ72805 A comparison of cup-to-disc ratio estimates by fundus biomicroscopy and stereoscopic optic disc photography in the Tema Eye Survey
Mwanza JC
Eye 2017; 31: 1184-1190
73439 Practice Preferences for Glaucoma Surgery: A Survey of the American Glaucoma Society
Vinod K
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 687-693
72665 Comparison of graft survival following penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a glaucoma drainage device
Iverson SM
International Ophthalmology 2018; 38: 223-231
73173 Next Generation PERG Method: Expanding the Response Dynamic Range and Capturing Response Adaptation
Monsalve P
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 5
73405 Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation: Initial Results in Refractory Glaucoma
Emanuel ME
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 726-729
73439 Practice Preferences for Glaucoma Surgery: A Survey of the American Glaucoma Society
Gedde SJ
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 687-693
73173 Next Generation PERG Method: Expanding the Response Dynamic Range and Capturing Response Adaptation
Triolo G
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 5
72805 A comparison of cup-to-disc ratio estimates by fundus biomicroscopy and stereoscopic optic disc photography in the Tema Eye Survey
Grover DS
Eye 2017; 31: 1184-1190
73405 Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation: Initial Results in Refractory Glaucoma
Grover DS
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 726-729
72665 Comparison of graft survival following penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a glaucoma drainage device
Spierer O; Papachristou GC
International Ophthalmology 2018; 38: 223-231
73173 Next Generation PERG Method: Expanding the Response Dynamic Range and Capturing Response Adaptation
Toft-Nielsen J
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 5
73439 Practice Preferences for Glaucoma Surgery: A Survey of the American Glaucoma Society
Feuer WJ
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 687-693
72805 A comparison of cup-to-disc ratio estimates by fundus biomicroscopy and stereoscopic optic disc photography in the Tema Eye Survey
Budenz DL
Eye 2017; 31: 1184-1190
73405 Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation: Initial Results in Refractory Glaucoma
Fellman RL; Godfrey DG
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 726-729
73173 Next Generation PERG Method: Expanding the Response Dynamic Range and Capturing Response Adaptation
Bohorquez J
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 5
72805 A comparison of cup-to-disc ratio estimates by fundus biomicroscopy and stereoscopic optic disc photography in the Tema Eye Survey
Herndon LW
Eye 2017; 31: 1184-1190
73439 Practice Preferences for Glaucoma Surgery: A Survey of the American Glaucoma Society
Panarelli JF
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 687-693
72665 Comparison of graft survival following penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with a glaucoma drainage device
Feuer WJ; Shi W
International Ophthalmology 2018; 38: 223-231
73173 Next Generation PERG Method: Expanding the Response Dynamic Range and Capturing Response Adaptation
Henderson AD
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 5
72805 A comparison of cup-to-disc ratio estimates by fundus biomicroscopy and stereoscopic optic disc photography in the Tema Eye Survey
Nolan W
Eye 2017; 31: 1184-1190
73405 Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation: Initial Results in Refractory Glaucoma
Smith O
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 726-729
73439 Practice Preferences for Glaucoma Surgery: A Survey of the American Glaucoma Society
Chang TC
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 687-693
73405 Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation: Initial Results in Refractory Glaucoma
Butler MR
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 726-729
73439 Practice Preferences for Glaucoma Surgery: A Survey of the American Glaucoma Society
Chen PP
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 687-693
72805 A comparison of cup-to-disc ratio estimates by fundus biomicroscopy and stereoscopic optic disc photography in the Tema Eye Survey
Whiteside-De Vos J
Eye 2017; 31: 1184-1190
