advertisement
Kasahara M 10
Showing records 1 to 10 | Display all abstracts from Kasahara M68910 Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients
Hirasawa K
Scientific reports 2016; 6: 25563
69454 Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma patients with different visual field progression speed
Hong Y
International Journal of Ophthalmology 2016; 9: 973-978
68910 Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients
Shoji N
Scientific reports 2016; 6: 25563
69454 Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma patients with different visual field progression speed
Shoji N
International Journal of Ophthalmology 2016; 9: 973-978
68910 Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients
Kasahara M
Scientific reports 2016; 6: 25563
69454 Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma patients with different visual field progression speed
Morita T; Hirasawa K
International Journal of Ophthalmology 2016; 9: 973-978
68910 Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients
Matsumura K
Scientific reports 2016; 6: 25563
69454 Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma patients with different visual field progression speed
Matsumura K
International Journal of Ophthalmology 2016; 9: 973-978
68910 Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients
Shimizu K
Scientific reports 2016; 6: 25563
69454 Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma patients with different visual field progression speed
Kasahara M; Shimizu K
International Journal of Ophthalmology 2016; 9: 973-978
