advertisement
6.1.1 Devices, techniques (104)
Showing records 1 to 25
Display all abstracts in classification 6.1.1 Devices, techniques
Search within classification 6.1.1 Devices, techniques70120 The Relationship between Corvis ST Tonometry and Ocular Response Analyzer Measurements in Eyes with Glaucoma
Matsuura M
PLoS ONE 2016; 11: e0161742
70004 Systematic Review of Current Devices for 24-h Intraocular Pressure Monitoring
Ittoop SM
Advances in Therapy 2016; 33: 1679-1690
70872 Tonographic Effect of Ocular Response Analyzer in Comparison to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
Zimmermann M
PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0169438
70267 Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Keratoconus With and Without Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments
Mendez-Hernandez C
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 71-76
69771 A Pilot Evaluation Assessing the Ease of Use and Accuracy of the New Self/Home-Tonometer IcareHOME in Healthy Young Subjects
Noguchi A
Journal of Glaucoma 2016; 25: 835-841
69959 Comparisons of the Tono-Pen® and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in the Measurement of Intraocular Pressure of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Patients in a Hospital Population in Southwest Nigeria
Onochie C
Medical Principles and Practice 2016; 25: 566-571
70382 How Often the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer Should be Checked for Calibration Error?
Choudhari NS
Journal of Glaucoma 2016; 25: 908-913
70231 Goldmann Tonometer Prism with an Optimized Error Correcting Applanation Surface
McCafferty S
Translational vision science & technology 2016; 5: 4
70686 Evaluation of correction formulas for tonometry : The Goldmann applanation tonometry in approximation to dynamic contour tonometry
Wachtl J
Ophthalmologe 2017; 114: 716-721
70889 A Comparison of the Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by the Corvis ST and Reichert 7CR Tonometers in Glaucoma Patients
Nakao Y
PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0170206
70812 Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry in relation to central corneal thickness and corneal curvature
Andreanos K
Clinical Ophthalmology 2016; 10: 2477-2484
70798 Corneal Thickness in Highlanders
Patyal S
High altitude medicine & biology 2017; 18: 56-60
69974 Self-Monitoring of Intraocular Pressure Outside of Normal Office Hours Using Rebound Tonometry: Initial Clinical Experience in Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma
Sood V
Journal of Glaucoma 2016; 25: 807-811
69747 Head Elevation and Intraocular Pressure in Glaucoma
Park JH
Optometry and Vision Science 2016; 93: 1163-1170
70817 Biomechanics of the sclera and effects on intraocular pressure
Jia X
International Journal of Ophthalmology 2016; 9: 1824-1831
70320 Long-term home monitoring of intraocular pressure in pediatric glaucoma
Bitner DP
Journal of AAPOS 2016; 20: 515-518
70656 Intraocular Pressure Measurements After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
Maier AB
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 258-265
70652 A Comparative Analysis of Goldmann Tonometry Correction
Asejczyk-Widlicka M
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 233-240
70055 The Fluctuation of Intraocular Pressure Measured by a Contact Lens Sensor in Normal-Tension Glaucoma Patients and Nonglaucoma Subjects
Tojo N
Journal of Glaucoma 2017; 26: 195-200
70786 Comparison of ICare and IOPen vs Goldmann applanation tonometry according to international standards 8612 in glaucoma patients
Pahlitzsch M
International Journal of Ophthalmology 2016; 9: 1624-1628
70798 Corneal Thickness in Highlanders
Arora A
High altitude medicine & biology 2017; 18: 56-60
69974 Self-Monitoring of Intraocular Pressure Outside of Normal Office Hours Using Rebound Tonometry: Initial Clinical Experience in Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma
Ramanathan US
Journal of Glaucoma 2016; 25: 807-811
70320 Long-term home monitoring of intraocular pressure in pediatric glaucoma
Freedman SF
Journal of AAPOS 2016; 20: 515-518
70686 Evaluation of correction formulas for tonometry : The Goldmann applanation tonometry in approximation to dynamic contour tonometry
Töteberg-Harms M
Ophthalmologe 2017; 114: 716-721
70872 Tonographic Effect of Ocular Response Analyzer in Comparison to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
Pitz S
PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0169438
