advertisement
Editors Selection IGR 20-2
List of Editor's Selection comments by
Chris Johnson
Emeritus Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Co-Director, Visual Field Reading Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
Clinical Examination Methods: Smartphone-based perimeters: Are we there yet? on:
121251 Comparing a Head-Mounted Smartphone Visual Field Analyzer to Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma: A Prospective Study
Wang SK; Tran EM; Yan W et al.
Journal of Glaucoma 2024; 33: 742-747
Comment on:
120394 Virtual Reality Visual Perceptual Plastic Training Promotes Retinal Structure and Macular Function Recovery in Glaucoma Patients
Zhao M; Lu Y; Wiederhold M et al.
Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking 2023; 26: 861-868
Clinical Examination Methods: A virtual reality perimeter on:
116724 Validation of a Wearable Virtual Reality Perimeter for Glaucoma Staging, The NOVA Trial: Novel Virtual Reality Field Assessment
Bradley C; Ahmed IIK; Samuelson TW et al.
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 10
Clinical Examination Methods: Tele-Perimetry: reliability and Compliance on:
104766 Test Reliability and Compliance to a Twelve-Month Visual Field Telemedicine Study in Glaucoma Patients
Prea SM; Vingrys AJ; Kong GYX
Journal of clinical medicine 2022; 11:
Clinical Examination Methods: How best to assess Visual Field loss in Glaucoma? on:
96026 Comparing Five Criteria for Evaluating Glaucomatous Visual Fields: 5 Visual Field Criteria for Evaluating Glaucoma
Stubeda H; Quach J; Gao J et al.
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2022; 237: 154-163
Clinical Examination Methods: Computerized Quantification of Visual Field Progression on:
96062 Hierarchical Censored Bayesian Analysis of Visual Field Progression
Montesano G; Garway-Heath DF; Ometto G et al.
Translational vision science & technology 2021; 10: 4
Clinical Examination Methods: Virtual-Reality Perimetry on:
84653 Validation of a Head-mounted Virtual Reality Visual Field Screening Device
Mees L; Upadhyaya S; Kumar P et al.
Journal of Glaucoma 2020; 29: 86-91
Clinical Examination Methods: Predicting Visual Field Progression on:
75682 Baseline 24-2 Central Visual Field Damage Is Predictive of Global Progressive Field Loss
Garg A; De Moraes CG; Cioffi GA et al.
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2018; 187: 92-98
Clinical Examination Methods: Reliability of Visual Fields on:
73414 Evidence-based Criteria for Assessment of Visual Field Reliability
Yohannan J; Wang J; Brown J et al.
Ophthalmology 2017; 124: 1612-1620
Clinical Examination Methods: Automated kinetic perimetry on:
71424 Reclaiming the Periphery: Automated Kinetic Perimetry for Measuring Peripheral Visual Fields in Patients With Glaucoma
Mönter VM; Crabb DP; Artes PH
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2017; 58: 868-875
Clinical Examination Methods: Swimming goggles and IOP on:
70091 Visual Field Testing with Head-Mounted Perimeter 'imo'
Matsumoto C; Yamao S; Nomoto H et al.
PLoS ONE 2016; 11: e0161974
Comment on:
67306 Structural and Functional Progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial
Öhnell H; Heijl A; Brenner L et al.
Ophthalmology 2016; 123: 1173-1180
Glaucoma Screening: Frequency-Doubling Perimetry for Glaucoma Screening on:
66389 Evaluation of Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry as a Means of Screening for Glaucoma and Other Eye Diseases Using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Boland MV; Gupta P; Ko F et al.
JAMA ophthalmology 2016; 134: 57-62
Clinical Examination Methods: Perimetric visual field pattern and early defect screening on:
60424 Modifying the Conventional Visual Field Test Pattern to Improve the Detection of Early Glaucomatous Defects in the Central 10°
Ehrlich AC; Raza AS; Ritch R et al.
Translational vision science & technology 2014; 3: 6
Therapeutic outcomes: Visual Field Improvement on:
57294 A Control Experiment for Studies that Show Improved Visual Sensitivity with Intraocular Pressure Lowering in Glaucoma
Anderson AJ; Stainer MJ
Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 2028-2032
Epidemiology: Glaucoma as cause of blindness on:
55997 Examining visual field loss in patients in glaucoma clinics during their predicted remaining lifetime
Saunders LJ; Russell RA; Kirwan JF et al.
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2014; 55: 102-109
Progression: Frequency-doubling perimetry on:
55436 Predicting progression of glaucoma from rates of frequency doubling technology perimetry change
Meira-Freitas D; Tatham AJ; Lisboa R et al.
Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 498-507
Perimetry: Seasonal visual field fluctuations on:
53113 Seasonal changes in visual field sensitivity and intraocular pressure in the ocular hypertension treatment study
Gardiner SK; Demirel S; Gordon MO et al.
Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 724-730
Perimetry: Scotoma progression patterns on:
51818 Progression Pattern of Initial Parafoveal Scotomas in Glaucoma
Su D; Park SC; Simonson JL et al.
Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 520-527
Perimetry: Visual field indices and ability to drive on:
50973 Practical landmarks for visual field disability in glaucoma
Saunders LJ; Russell RA; Crabb DP
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2012; 96: 1185-1189
Comments on:
48060 Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness and Local Visual Field Sensitivity in Glaucoma
Raza AS; Cho J; De Moraes CGV et al.
Archives of Ophthalmology 2011; 129: 1529-1536
Visual Function Tests: Postillumination pupil responses on:
47976 Intrinsically photosensitive (melanopsin) retinal ganglion cell function in glaucoma
Feigl B; Mattes D; Thomas R et al.
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2011; 52: 4362-4367
Progression: Agreement of VF interpretation on:
45509 Agreement of visual field interpretation among glaucoma specialists and comprehensive ophthalmologists: comparison of time and methods
Lin AP; Katz LJ; Spaeth GL et al.
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2011; 95: 828-831
Comments on:
27800 A Randomized Trial of Brimonidine Versus Timolol in Preserving Visual Function: Results From the Low-pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study
Krupin T; Liebmann JM; Greenfield DS et al.
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2011; 151: 671-681
Perimetry: Agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of progression on:
27931 Interobserver agreement and intraobserver reproducibility of the subjective determination of glaucomatous visual field progression
Tanna AP; Bandi JR; Budenz DL et al.
Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 60-65
Population Genetics: Glaucoma in Africans versus Europeans on:
26213 African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): III. Ancestry differences in visual function in healthy eyes
Racette L; Liebmann JM; Girkin CA et al.
Archives of Ophthalmology 2010; 128: 551-559
Function Tests: Microperimetry versus Humphrey 10-2 on:
25055 A Comparison between Microperimetry and Standard Achromatic Perimetry of the Central Visual Field in Eyes with Glaucomatous Paracentral Visual Field Defects
Lima VC; Prata TS; De Moraes CG et al.
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2010; 94: 64-67
Clinical Examination Methods: New developments: Multifocal pupillography on:
24796 Multifocal pupillographic visual field testing in glaucoma
Maddess T; Bedford SM; Goh XL et al.
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2009; 37: 678-686
Visual Function and Structure: Socioeconomic and clinical factors on:
23909 The influence of socioeconomic and clinical factors upon the presenting visual field status of patients with glaucoma
Sukumar S; Spencer F; Fenerty C et al.
Eye 2009; 23: 1038-1044
Visual Function Tests: VF progression criteria on:
21862 A comparison of visual field progression criteria of 3 major glaucoma trials in early manifest glaucoma trial patients
Heijl A; Bengtsson B; Chauhan BC et al.
Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1557-1565
Structure and function measurements: Visual field index and rate of progression on:
20340 A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2008; 145: 343-353
Visual function: SITA versus FDT on:
16946 Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry
Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H et al.
Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 480-487
Visual function: SITA versus FDT on:
16842 Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc
Sakata LM; Deleon-Ortega J; Arthur SN et al.
Archives of Ophthalmology 2007; 125: 340-345
Examination methods: To SWAP or SAP; that's the question on:
14106 Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 1092-1097
Clinical examination methods: Progression analysis and visual field on:
12489 Bayes' theorem applied to perimetric progression detection in glaucoma: from specificity to positive predictive value
Jansonius NM
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2005; 243: 433-437
Visual function on:
11706 Probing glaucoma visual damage by rarebit perimetry
Brusini P; Salvetat ML; Parisi L et al.
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005; 89: 180-184
